The slippery slope fallacy is something that many people fall into while writing something persuasive. This fallacy mostly happens when it is a primarily emotional argument with no factual support. The way it works is you make a claim that isn't entirely true, and then you base the rest of your argument on this point, even more "facts" off of this one slightly true fact you have stated. An example of this would be: "We can't allow people to go treasure hunting. By going treasure hunting people are more likely to trespass on other people's land in order to find treasure. By making trespassing less serious, people will start to loss their sense of other people's privacy. As you can see, if we allow people to pursuer treasure hunting, they will eventually start to break into other people's homes."
Answer:
Well it looks like the person is trying to justice for something to me and also wants to be equal with people
Explanation:
hope this helps you :)
Answer:
Child trafficking is worse
Explanation:
Stealing is not as bad as child trafficking. Child trafficking is awful and happens everywhere, along with stealing. With stealing, you can always give the stuff back that you stole. Child trafficking, not so much. Child trafficking is where children are sold in slavery and they send them to far away country's to do slave work. It happens everywhere. Stealing doesn't give you as much jail time. If you get caught child trafficking, you go to jail for 10+ years. Child trafficking is worse
The answer is c hope that helps
