Answer:
fhfhdbdbdbdhdgzbdbdbdbdbdhdgdhdbdbdbdbdbdbfbdbdbdbbdbddbdhdgfgdhdhdhdh
Explanation:
a
Machiavelli establishes in his book that an ideal political leader must have the following qualities to achieve his goals:
1) Being feared, as he says in the page 65 of The Prince. In the medieval era it was safer to be feared rather than to be loved, because fear was a stop for revolutionary ideas against the leader. But as Machiavelli adds in page 72, that fear should not turn into hate as that would be dangerous for the leader.
2) Being supported by the governed, because if the people doesn't support the leader, this one wouldn't be able to carry out his policies, as he needs the people to execute those.
3) Virtue, because with them it is easier to gain the people's support necessary to carry out the policies wanted by the leader, as it is described in point 2.
4) Using one own's arms, this is said in chapters 12 and 13. Machiavelli says that is better to use the own citizens in battle rather than hiring mercenaries, as the citizens would be willing to die for the cause, and would support the leader no matter what.
5) Intelligence, this is the most important of all the qualities. Without intelligence, the leader would not be able to achieve the other four qualities. This quality allows the prince to take the best decisions for him and his people.
Explanation:
The caning of Charles Sumner detailed Senator Charles Sumner of Massachusetts arguing that what was done to Kansas (pro-slavery people illegally swept the polls and vowed to kill all abolitionists, followed by over 200 people killed in the violence that followed) was very bad as well as slavery. He singled out Andrew Pickens Butler of South Carolina, and his cousin, Preston S Brooks, beat Sumner with a cane until it broke on May 22, 1856. This showed how fiery and aggressive the North and South were to each other in the events leading to the Civil War, as they were literally willing to kill other members of Congress to get their points across. It is important to note that in most legislative sessions both before and after the event, violence was rare if there at all
I believe the answer is "C" because Zoroastrianism emphasized on the freedom of an individual to choose right from wrong! An individual has the power to think Good thoughts, say good words and increase his divine intuition to be closer to everlasting life with our creator, as well as to do the opposit and destroy any changes of a happy ever after.
