Answer: When the Giver advised to not increase to population when the committee of elders wanted to increase the population because the giver knew that more people could lead to over population.
Explanation:
More people means more mouths to feed. Too many mouths to feed could lead to sarvation and hunger.
Answer:
Feldman reaches the conclusion that most people are honest without receiving an incentive by
studying a counterclaim about morality and arriving at a broad generalization.
Explanation:
A researcher can reach a conclusion that most people are honest after studying a counterclaim about morality. He can then arrive at a broad generalization.
A counterclaim is the opposite of an argument, or simply, the opposing argument. A counterclaim research is one undertaken to establish that the opposite of a research situation prevails. It is a claim made against a situation or an established position in order to rebut the claimed position.
In this instance, Glaucon had taken a position that no man could resist the temptation of evil if he knew his acts could not be witnessed or dictated. For Feldman to contradict this claim, with a conclusion that 87% of the time, a man could resist the temptation of evil even if he knew his acts could not be witnessed or dictated because he had become invisible, it means that he had researched the counterclaim.
<span>An imperative sentence is to command as a declarative sentence is to make a statement as of a fact for example The sky is blue or The traffic is heavy or The population is growing.</span>
