Answer:
1. Andrew Carnegie
You probably recognize Andrew Carnegie’s name, since he’s one of the most famous and richest industrialists of all time. However, he didn’t accumulate his wealth as a result of formal education or a business-charged background. Instead, he dropped out of school at a young age and spent the major portion of his youth performing manual labor. He was a bobbin boy at a local cotton mill and then became a telegraph messenger. It wasn’t until he taught himself how to read and entered the railroad industry that he began to build the empire that would make him (and his family) a fortune.
2. John Paul DeJoria
You may not have heard of John Paul DeJoria, but you’ve certainly indulged in some of the beauty products attached to his name. Now a multi-billionaire and one of the most accomplished entrepreneurs in modern history, DeJoria got his start as a newspaper courier. To make ends meet, he worked as a tow truck driver and a janitor. Eventually, he found his way to working at a hair-care company, where he met his future partner, Paul Mitchell. With minimal experience and a $700 loan, the duo founded a company now known as John Paul Mitchell Systems. From there, DeJoria co-founded Patron Spirits and the House of Blues.
3. Harland Sanders
If someone asked you for a loan to start a restaurant, but had no formal culinary training or experience, would you make that loan? It seems crazy to think anyone could become a successful restauranteur without a background in the industry, but that’s exactly what Harlan “Colonel” Sanders was able to do. When he started his line of Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurants, the only experience he had was cooking for his siblings as a child and working at a number of odd jobs.
Answer:
1. $275 million
Yes
2. 30%
Explanation:
Calculation for the NPV of the investment opportunity
NPV = –100 + 30/0.08
NPV= $275 million
Therefore the NPV will be $275 million
Yes, Based on the above Calculation they should make the investment
2. Calculation for IRR
IRR: 0 = –100 + 30/IRR
Hence,
IRR = 30/100
IRR = 30%
Therefore the IRR will be 30%
The IRR is great only in a situation where the cost of capital does not go beyond 30%.
17 which should equal 215.01 I think- sorry if I’m wrong
<span>Good IT management which is necessary for a great IT plan should advise management if technology being considered to solve a problem is not yet proven. Before an IT team decided to use a new type of </span>technology, it is important for them to make sure they have tested the technology and it has proven its capabilities. It is necessary for the technology to prove it can finish all of it's required tasks for the technology to be integrated into their system.
Answer:
Explanation:
In a scenario such as this one, the broker-dealer is not required to disclose whether any guarantee of growth was made by the representative to induce the giving of the testimonial. This is backed by the FINRA rule on testimonials used in communications which states the following:
“Retail communications or correspondence providing any testimonial concerning the investment advice or investment performance of a member or its products must prominently disclose the following:
- The fact that the testimonial may not be representative of the experience of other customers.
- The fact that the testimonial is no guarantee of future performance or success.
- If more than $100 in value is paid for the testimonial, the fact that it is a paid testimonial.”
