Answer:
Little
Explanation:
I think to complete the sentence, it should be "there is a little water left." But either way, it should be little. It wouldn't sound right for someone to say "there is a few water."
Answer:
B) While most modern zoos do not teach animals to perform "tricks," they do train animals to respond to certain commands to make them safer to handle, move and examine.
Explanation:
The sentence lacks parallelism, which occurs when there are similar grammatical structures within senteces and paragraphs. In the sentence given, the last part that refers to the reasons why animals are trained has different and incorrect verb forms, which make the sentence difficult to read. Thus, the correct version includes the full infinitive <em>to </em>for the verbs <em>handle, move </em>and <em>examine</em>.
This logical fallacy is called "ad hominem", which means "to the man" in latin. It means that, instead of debating about the specific question, you rather attack the person, in an attempt to discredit him and his words.
It is a logical fallacy because, when debating about anything, you should always and only talk about the actual point, instead of considering who said what.
If a serial killer claims that 2+2 equals 4, you can say something like "don't listen to him! He's a serial killer!". Yes, he may be one of the worst human being to have ever lived, but it doesn't change that this specific claim he made is true.
I think I have a good question
Why do we use this body language to understand each other? How do we know what these thing mean?
