1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
FromTheMoon [43]
3 years ago
6

Which of the following best defines trustbusting?

History
2 answers:
nadya68 [22]3 years ago
7 0
D.
Trust busting is the manipulation of an economy, carried out by governments around the world, in an attempt to prevent or eliminate monopolies and corporate trusts.
Licemer1 [7]3 years ago
5 0

The statement that best defines trust busting "dissolving business trusts and monopolies".

Answer: Option D

<u>Explanation:</u>

There are instances where trusts will be the owner of conglomerates. This leads to a monopoly in the industry which can sometimes be detrimental to the economy because by eliminating monopolies, economy can encourage competition in the market, which can benefit consumers and producers.

This was initiated by Theodore Roosevelt and is now common in a lot of countries. So, trust busting is the process of dissolving business trusts and monopolies. This is done by governments to remove monopolies.

You might be interested in
Using the Internet, find one image that represents the views of government of Aristotle, one image that represents the views of
krok68 [10]
I'll give you some thoughts on the political views of the thinkers named. It's up to you to search for images and write your descriptions.

Aristotle believed there were three valid types of government, depending on the size and scope of what was to be governed or upon local situations. (He studied the constitutions of various governments as part of his work in writing <em />his work, <em>Politics.</em>)  As state with a sole ruler ruling rightly is a monarchy.  If that form of state is abused, it becomes tyranny.  A state with a number of members of the ruling class is an aristocracy -- rule by the excellent ones, noble men suited for governing.  If it is corrupted by having a few rule but not of noble character or in a noble way, Aristotle referred to that as an oligarchy (rule by a few).  A state in which all worthy men participate in governing Aristotle termed a polity, a constitutional government.  He saw it as a corruption, though, to have a full democracy (rule by the people), which would become the sort of thing we call mob rule.

Aquinas picked up thoughts from Aristotle, who had favored a monarchy.  Aquinas, writing from a Christian perspective, wrote about the righteous and proper sort of ruler who would serve as God's appointed leader among the people, truly caring for them (not becoming a tyrant).

Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx were partners in establishing communism as a political ideology.  Engels and Marx believed that in time, class struggles between overlords and those beneath them would give way to a society in which all ruled and lived and worked collectively.
3 0
2 years ago
Explain the strengths of the Articles of Confederation and how people reacted to this document.
Doss [256]
The major downfall of the Articles of Confederation was simply weakness. The federal government, under the Articles, was too weak to enforce their laws and therefore had no power. The Continental Congress had borrowed money to fight the Revolutionary War and could not repay their debts.

Hope this helped! :)
4 0
2 years ago
The Supreme Court is made up of how many justices
kari74 [83]
There haven't always been nine justices on the court. The U.S. Constitution established the Supreme Court but left it to Congress to decide how many justices should make up the court. The Judiciary Act of 1789 set the number at six: a chief justice and five associate justices.
6 0
3 years ago
HELP ASAP IT'S DUE TODAY!!!!!!
Mandarinka [93]
B and c brainliest pleaseeee
4 0
3 years ago
What was the main reason the Persians went to war with Greece? a. To control and develop more trade routes b. To benefit from mo
Dominik [7]

Answer:

I believe its A

Explanation:

because it not specifically that. they went to war because the economy burdens, the feeling of being treated unfairly by the empire.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What contribution did muckrakers make to the reform movement?
    9·1 answer
  • What is a intesting fact about the ffa creed and when was it established
    14·1 answer
  • Fetterman fight was there really 1000 warriors there?
    9·1 answer
  • Which is the best example of a secondary source document useful in the study of history?
    10·2 answers
  • Why does polonius say that he will spy on hamlets conversation with his mother?
    14·2 answers
  • This excerpt from a letter of an early settler in pennsylvania describes the colony's policy of _____.
    12·1 answer
  • What is Thomas Paine’s primary purpose in The Crisis?
    14·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of slavery from colonial times to the civil war?​
    15·1 answer
  • Read the passage retold from The Tale of Genji.
    7·2 answers
  • Explain why the Arabs felt betrayed by the British after British occupation of Palestine.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!