Hope it helps!
1. H
2. I
3. E
4. J
5.F
6. G
7. C
8. A
9. B
10. D
Answer:conflict shows us whether or not the theme has man vs man, man vs nature, man vs society, or man vs self
Explanation:
Since I am unable to see or know where the point of view is coming from, here are some ways to identify the point of view. For first-person it would be using " I, me, and my" Second-person is still centered around one person, but uses he, him, her, she, and so on. The third-person is a reflection of all the charecters, so it will say most of their unsaid thoughts and uses he, him, her, and she.
Each POV gives a different meaning and life to the story, even if it may seem useless and it was just the author's preferred writing style. For example, first-person gives the story a more realistic point of view, and also these stories may connect to the reader better. Second-person gives a broader range of perspective, even if it is still centered around the one character it still describes their surroundings better. Third-person I imagine being like watching a movie but instead reading it. This POV can help the readers, because now instead of getting one persons point of view, they are understanding all character's POVs.
hope this helps in some way shape or form.
B is the only answer that makes sense. Research and facts validate information in the article.
Answer:
The statement is an unjustified implication because it implies that no other vitamins are important and that no preventive measures are effective if they lack vitamin C.
Explanation:
An unjustified implication is a statement that leaves messages implicit and implied. This type of statement ends up passing messages in indirect and subjunctive ways, related to the main message being spoken.
In the statement shown in the question above, the speaker places supreme importance on vitamin C, implying that other types of vitamins and preventive measures are inefficient.
