Why has the Vietnam War come to be viewed in a negative light? Is this negative view warranted?

History

1 answer:

Leto [7]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

reason why Vietnam War viewed in negative light

- Because it resulted in too many amount of death on both sides

- It caused economic damage that felt by the rest of the seasons.

and yes, this negative view was warranted

Explanation:

Initially, the Vietnam war obtained a positive acceptance from the public, since at that time the government framed the war as an effort to spread the influence of Soviet Union in South East Asia.

But the war lasted longer than expected.

It resulted in around 2 million deaths on both sides. Large portion of it was innocent civilian in vietnam. (since vietnam was the battleground, many of them caught in crossfire)

The government also had to spend a lot of money to military budget. This cut out the fund that can be allocated for welfare programs. In the end, many economists believed that the war contributed to the economic inflation in late 1960s

You might be interested in

This is two or more equations with common variables, also known as a linear system.

Ivan

This is two or more equations with common variables, also known as a linear system. System Of Equations

5 0

2 years ago

The situations listed below illustrate when voter-turnout was low in the United States EXCEPT for which ONE of the following?

hodyreva [135]

In political science, voter turnout is the percentage of eligible voters who participated in an election. Hence, the sentence that depicts low t u tornnnouts.

<h3>Eligibility</h3>

Eligibility varies by country, and the voting-eligible population should not be confused with the total adult population.

Therefore, the sentence that does not illustrate voter-turnouts is a.The scandals of the past several decades have fostered a lower correlation between self-efficacy and voting

learn more about voter-turnouts from here:https: //brainly.com/question/1747503

6 0

2 years ago

Senator Jenna Jacobsen was elected as one of her state’s two senators in 2006. Assuming that Ms. Jacobsen wins her first re-elec

choli [55]

the answer is D, let me know if its the correct answer :)

6 0

2 years ago

If the US President was just accused of accepting bribes while in office. What power does Congress have to bring against him? Wh

cluponka [151]

(Not exactly sure about the answer) The Congress would have to bring treason against the president, because of the fact that the president went against the countries rules by taking a bribe that could've been related to helping another country. The responsibilities of the Reps. and the senate would have to be, to give the president the punishment of impeachment.

3 0

3 years ago

Durkheim argues that deviance is important to society. What functions does he believe deviance gives society? Do you agree with

Vladimir79 [104]

I agree with him, in a way that deviance creates norms that eventually informs the members of a particular society of what behaviors are acceptable or unacceptable.

Durkheim mentioned four factors, as to where he grounded the importance of deviance in the society.

First, deviance affirms cultural values and norms. Second, it also clarifies moral boundaries. Third, it promotes social unity by creating an us/them dichotomy, encourages social change, and provides jobs to control deviance. Certain factors of personality are theoretically and empirically related to workplace deviance, such as work environment, and individual differences. Lastly, it can be assertions of individuality and identity.

4 0

3 years ago