US foreign policy today is hard to describe as its changing with the election of trump but lets say that we were observing the time a bit before this and more in the present-day era.
We used to stay neutral will all countries we could but we began to see that it was not always best to stay neutral (as in the case of WWI and WWII). The failed attempt after World War I to make a league of nations that operated well just demonstrated the problems we had, and was the reason why WWII happened and adolf hitler was able to come to power.
Today, we use economic and military forces on places that are labeled unstable to try and make these places more stable and set up a democratic government.
This for the most part, has failed miserably such as in Syria and Iraq.
Again, mods, please write me if you have concerns over links but I find students learn best sometimes from visuals. This video describes the problem that happened in Iraq/Syria that led to the failure of US troops trying to make the government more stable.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQPlREDW-Ro
This second video goes more in-depth about the Syrian crisis and shows how US foreign policies affected it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvOnXh3NN9w&t=12s
Answer:
hope this helps
Explanation:
Villus, plural villi, in anatomy any of the small, slender, vascular projections that increase the surface area of a membrane. ... The villi of the small intestine project into the intestinal cavity, greatly increasing the surface area for food absorption and adding digestive secretions.
Explanation:
Alipin Saguiguilid
Slaves who lived in their creditor's house and were entirely dependent on him for food and shelter. Male alipin sagigilid who married were often raised to namamahay status, because it was more economical for his master (as opposed to supporting him and his new family under the same roof).
Can give me brainliest and thanks
<span>The federal government had not prosecuted Southern racist violence.--Though the government was providing legal protection on the law books, there was no follow through for violence against rioters.
Violence against marchers and rioters was often not addressed by the government. The Supreme Court had desegregated schools and began enforcing the spirit of the 14 and 15 Amendments. Government leadership spoke of equality and fair treatment but violence was never addressed. </span>