Answer:
B
Explanation:
They said that Tian or "heaven" did not require the ruler of the land to be of noble decent and had no term limit. They were just expected to be good and just and would lose his position by way of natural disaster if they lost sight of that.
Answer:
The statement does not take away the credibility of how history is interpreted by historians. On the other hand, it validates it. For example, the account of the historains during the period of Emperor Caesar and his bossom friend who led people to murder him in the senatorum chamber, the human values like betrayal, disappointment which it teaches is clear without being subjective to the historian's ethnicity or experience.
Explanation:
The first time he came to power he was elected but the second time he took power by force i hope this helps
The National Assembly of France.
This was illegal according to the laws of the time, but the 3rd Estate was declaring those laws and rules as a system that opposed the will and well-being of the people of France.
The old laws on the books said that when a gathering of the Estates General occurred, each of the three estates met separately and each group had one collective vote (the consensus of the whole group) as their final vote. The 1st Estate (clergy) and 2nd Estate (nobility), representing 2% of the population total, would combine their votes in opposition to the vote of the 3rd Estate (the common people). The 3rd Estate essentially declared that they, 98% of the nation, were the nation and that their delegates thus were the National Assembly.
There's more to the story than that, but we'll keep it brief here for now!
