Deforestation is not a natural change.
Regarding human traits, Locke would most likely agree with Aristotle.
There are more areas where Aristotle and Locke's philosophical views diverge than where they concur. For instance, Aristotle once claimed that a person's happiness was just as important to them as it was to their political community. The political understanding of Locke, however, is different because, in his view, a government only assumes responsibility for a portion of the human rights that it is meant to protect in accordance with what people deem to be right. Individuals are therefore given priority because they have rights that are inalienable and shouldn't be manipulated by people to fit their agenda. These and other traditional philosophies have been used to analyze and comprehend early philosophy.
Learn more about Locke here:-
brainly.com/question/13346823?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Answer:
not too sure but a . . . . .. .
Answer:
si todo cambia porsue le encanta el cambio
