Answer: All right, here goes nothing. *cracks knuckles*
To begin with, the article has a weak claim. While it does vaguely introduce their stance on the topic, it poses it as a question and not a statement. Also, this claim is written in the first person, unlike strong claims that are supposed to be written in the third person. As for the "support" section, even the very beginning strays from the original claim, instead saying why <em>they </em>should own a pet instead of why <em>everyone</em> should be allowed to own pets. For example, in the second paragraph, the author cites a story from a friend of a friend. That is not valid evidence. If it was on the news, however, and the author cited that as evidence instead, the article would be much stronger. The author also delves deeper into their own personal life instead of stating facts as they should have. The transition between paragraphs is clunky at best, with the third paragraph pretty much restating the claim instead of simply saying something like "Pets are helpful to our society." And finally, the entire purpose of that last sentence seems to be to wrap up the article in a hasty fashion, without any attention to restating the claim or the facts presented.
Hope this meets the criteria! Good luck!!
Answer:
According to the text, we can say that Wallace chose to choose his career and life because he was happy in the real world and the happiness behind the green door was fleeting.
Explanation:
answer because
Wallace felt great behind the green door, but that happiness was fleeting and didn't last when he returned home.
In that case, he was left with an extreme feeling of sadness and melancholy and that was a very bad feeling.
However, starting a college, having contact with people, and planning his own life and career, was something that made Wallace happy, and that happiness was maintained.
Wallace thought that happiness in the real world was more stable, as it was a happiness that depended on him and that he could have it wherever he went.
It is d its. hope this helped
The answer is not C, the real answer is A. The lack of color distracts the eye from the children's dirty faces and clothing. i just took the quiz.
PLZ give me a hart
