Answer: i hope this helps i think its to long but just copy what you need
A League of Nations mandate was a legal status for certain territories transferred from the control of one country to another following World War I, or the legal instruments that contained the internationally agreed-upon terms for administering the territory on behalf of the League of Nations. These were of the nature of both a treaty and a constitution, which contained minority rights clauses that provided for the rights of petition and adjudication by the International Court.[1]
The mandate system was established under Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, entered into force on 28 June 1919. With the dissolution of the League of Nations after World War II, it was stipulated at the Yalta Conference that the remaining Mandates should be placed under the trusteeship of the United Nations, subject to future discussions and formal agreements. Most of the remaining mandates of the League of Nations (with the exception of South-West Africa) thus eventually became United Nations Trust Territories.
Two governing principles formed the core of the Mandate System, being non-annexation of the territory and its administration as a “sacred trust of civilization” to develop the territory for the benefit of its native people.[2]
They both depended on the rivers. And human sacrifice XD. <span />
The correct answer is C). The two countries are strong trading partners.
The statement that best describes the relationship between the United States and South Korea today is<em> the two countries are strong trading partners</em>.
The U. S. and South Korea not only have a strong trade relationship. South Korea is a key U.S. ally in the region, threatened by the presence of North Korea and its military warnings and the suspicion of nuclear bomb armament.
The relationship of the United States and South Korea surpasses the commerce and has meant stability in the zone. Both countries have agreements in other areas of cooperation.
