Answer:
A
Explanation:
In a summary, don't retell every detail, just the important parts.
Answer and Explanation:
After reading the essay "Names nombres" written by J. Alvarez, we can learn how difficult it is for a family of Spanish origin to maintain their names and traditions within a totally different culture like that of the USA, especially when that family comes from a country considered to be "third world", seen as inferior and often shameful and devalued. This affected the way Alvarez saw her own identity, associated with her and her family names. These names were pronounced so differently by the Americans, it seemed that they were erasing the Latin origin of it and imposing an Americanized and more "normal" version.
In this essay, Alvarez approaches her youth as a Latin immigrant in the USA. It shows how difficult it is to live between two cultures and how it affects various elements in people's lives.
The story about the Chanticleer and the fox is as old as the tale. The Chanticleer supervised the farmyard, waking everyone when the sun rises. Even thinking that he made it rose. The fox told him he admired his singing in the morning but with the intent of bringing him into the woods to be eaten so his morning singing won't bother other animals again. Fortunately, Chanticleer escaped from the fox's grip.
Answer:
Outline:
- What is freedom of expression.
- The problems of limiting that freedom.
- The need to know how to differentiate between freedom of expression and oppression and intolerance.
- Conclusion.
Explanation:
Freedom of expression is the permission of people to speak their opinions and to position themselves on other people's opinions without suffering any reprisals from anyone. Freedom of expression is a right defended by the first constitutional amendment, in addition to being a humanitarian right that must be respected by all.
Limiting or punishing freedom of expression, therefore, is a negative thing, as it limits the population of the truth, in addition to limiting rationality, questioning and the ability of human beings to think for themselves and show their thoughts. In this case, the punishment of freedom of expression is something tyrannical and should not be promoted in any case and at any time, regardless of what it is.
However, for the population to have free freedom of expression, it is necessary that first, the population knows how to differentiate what is freedom of expression and what is oppression and intolerance. This is because many people use the right to freedom of expression to offend, be prejudiced and hide the hatred of population groups. This is harmful and does not add anything good in the world.
Therefore, we can conclude that punishing freedom of expression is negative for the population, however, it is important that the population is taught about what is opinion and what is hate speech and intolerance.
