<span>Diamond is an evolutionary biologist, interested in adaptations, and he proceeds to speculate that New Guineans exhibit these heightened-mental-activity traits in response to their environment, which presents them with constant and varied challenges. He gets away with it because (1) this statement is buried inside his main thesis, which is in accord with the fundamental dogma (Western superiority is just an accident of geography), and (2) his superior racial group is non-white, and it's okay to call whites inferior</span>
I would disagree.
It is not always important to be noticed, because you don't have to depend on other people's approval. If you are satisfied with your accomplishments, why does it matter if someone else is going to praise you for them or not? You should be happy, regardless of other people's opinions and thoughts.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the text or the excerpt for reference.
There are also no options attached.
What response? From who? What is the reference?
However, trying to help, we can comment on the following general terms.
What does his response tell you about the Framers' intentions regarding the institutional design of the judiciary?
You are probably referring to Federalists Alexander Hamilton's opinion about the judiciary.
If that is the case, then we can say that Alexander Hamilton wrote the Federalists Paper n.- 78, under a pseudonym, and he referred to the importance of the judiciary. He considered that the judiciary was an important institution to help and protect the people from bad or abusive legislation.
Hamilton also thought that the judiciary was important to enforce the legislation included in the US Constitution. Hamilton thought that the judiciary had the obligation to interpret the legislation to correctly apply it, and also should be the institution to keep an eye on Congress in order to limit it to exceed its powers.
Answer:
essay below
Explanation:
Government plays a large factor in today's society and has a lot of control over it. Government should be monitoring and changing today's society in a positive way.
The first souce indicates that the government allowed children to work in dangerous conditions, and it was unhealthy as a whole towards everyone who worked there. This was later changed after laws were passed.
The second source shows food insecurity among Inuit Children, the government is needed in areas like these to help support their civilians.
The third source shows equality towards all, now while this is not present throughout the societies of the world and sometimes even governments, this is something that the government should contribute in.
Overall, I suggest that the government should be helping modify today's society and it's problems, such as homelessness, going hungry, healthcare, worker's rights, etc.
