Answer:
A difference between the Texas constitution and the U.S Constitution is that the Texas Constitution is supposed to provide a rigid structure for government, leaving no room for interpretation or whatsoever.
Whereas the US Constitution is what is known as a Case-law Constitution, that is, it is based on judicial interpretation of laws that have been enacted by legislative bodies and governing documents, where the document is meant only to provide a basic structure to the government.
Answer: On a two-lane highway you must always drive in the right lane unless you are overtaking and passing (where permitted). If the road has four or more lanes with two-way traffic, drive in the right lanes except when overtaking and passing.
Answer:
This may vary from country to country but for the purpose of this question. Am choosing U.S. since its a country that have very wider connection with other countries of the World.
Article II Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, the Commander in Chief clause, states that President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States.
Answer:
Efectivamente, considero sumamente necesaria la inclusión de los derechos humanos en las Constituciones Nacionales de los distintos países, aunque luego no se cumplan de modo completo o efectivo. Esto es así porque en definitiva una Constitución Nacional es, además de la ley suprema de un país y la carta de derechos de sus ciudadanos, una manifestación de voluntad de parte del propio estado, en la cual éste admite tener como objetivo la protección de ciertos derechos y preceptos jurídicos. Así, la inclusión de los derechos humanos en una ley con rango constitucional implicará necesariamente la inclusión de estos derechos dentro de las prerrogativas de los individuos, así como su exigibilidad por parte de la comunidad internacional.