They were politics......................
Answer:
Ovid foreshadows the fall of Icarus in the story Deadalus and Icarus by Elaina Curtis when Deadalus warned His son Icarus not to fly too high and not to fly too low.
Explanation:
Deadalus said to His son "Let me warn you, Icarus, to take the middle way, in case the moisture weighs down your wings, if you fly too low, or if you fly too high, the sun schorches them. Travel between the extremes. And i order you not to aim towards Bootes, the Herdsman or Helice, the Great Bear or towards the drawn Sword or Orion: take the course i show you".
The above statement by Deadalus is a good example of foreshadowing. Foresadowing lets Readers predict what will happen next. The statement shows Deadalus warning His son Icarus not to fly to high and too low. by doing this Hints to readers that Icarius might die. The statement helps Readers predict what may happen next. from the warning the Readers can predict that although if Icarus does not die that He may get into trouble. Hence the essence of foreshadowing in a story.
Answer:
15 presents
Explanation:
1. Find the amount it takes to multiply 8 by to get 30. The reason we need to find this is because we need to multiply 4 by the same number to get the amount of presents, because if you multiply one number in a relationship by some number, you have to do the same to the other number. To get from 8 to 30, you multiply by 3 3/4 (30/8).
2. Multiply 4 by that number. 4 * 30/8 (3 3/4) is equal to 30/2, which is equal to 15. This means that she wrapped 15 presents
A blog is a dairy or newsletter that appears
Answer:on the internet
Blogs include dated entries written by the author, which are called
Answer: posts
One advantage of a blog is that writers can
Answer: add photos or maps
One benefit of reading a blog is the ability to
answer: click links to websites
Explanation:
It is reliant on the intensity of the attack as well as the power of the attacking nation.
some countries have been attacked and literally never fought back but surrendered if the attacking nation is more powerful in terms of military power.
in case the intensity of the attack can be absorbed, a country can also opt for diplomacy as war is the ultimate sanction in international relation.
in case the country feels it has the capacity to protect its sovereignty then fighting back is the only option.
another way to look at it would be one of the most difficult issues in foreign policy is deciding when the United States should exercise military force. Most people think that military force may be used if a vital national interest of the United States is threatened. The difficulty lies in getting people to agree on what constitutes a vital national interest.
Almost everyone would agree that an attack by a foreign country on the United States threatens a vital interest. Many also would think a vital interest threatened if a country attacked a nation that we had signed a security agreement with. Disagreements emerge when the threat involves the free flow of a precious commodity, such as oil. They also surface over situations that do not pose an immediate threat to U.S. security but could imperil it in the future, such as when a region becomes unstable and the instability may lead to wider conflicts. Another area of debate opens over human rights and humanitarian efforts. The United States is the most powerful democratic nation on Earth. Does that mean we always have a vital interest in promoting human rights and democracy? Or, should we stay out of the affairs of other nations unless they threaten other of our national interests?
Another issue arises over how the United States should exercise military force. Some argue that America should never act unilaterally, but should only act with others, allies or particularly with the United Nations. They believe America has a strong interest in upholding international law. Others agree that it is appropriate to act in coalitions, but they think demanding it in every circumstance would paralyze America’s role as a world leader.
