To import and export the goods
Answer:
Explanation:
I think this question is rooted in WWII when the Japanese were being put into interment camps- so I will answer based on that. The United States, regardless of race, has no justification to take away the rights of its citizens. Even in times of war, someone needs to be accused of being a spy with actual hard <em>evidence</em> before they should be subjected to that.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The effect of the emphasis on loyalty to a group that had the revolutionary movement in the French people was precise that it strengthened the solidarity ties of the Frenchs who sought in that movement, and avenue to equity, liberty, and progress. It made the French people more united for a while, enduring the consequences of the movement, united. Yes, to French revolutionaries, the ideal of fraternity was just as important as the Enlightenment ideals of liberty and equality.
On the other hand, if we compared this French result to the American culture after its revolution, we can say that American colonists started to dive because of the formation of factions or political parties with divergent ideas that sometimes we're not the same as the ideas instituted by the founding fathers of the country. That is why President George Washington was not so fond of political parties.
Prithvi Narayan Shah sent Gorkhali troops, under Kaji Biraj Thapa, to attack Nuwakot. ... After his kingdom spread from north to south, he made Kantipur the capital of expanded country, which was then known as Kingdom of Gorkha (Gorkha Samrajya).
Ok so step 2, Does Lincoln think that we can continue to have some slave states and some free states. Lincoln wanted freedom in ALL states. he wanted to abolish slavery and he was against it. He knows that there cannot be a agreement so he says <span>I believe this government cannot endure permanently half-slave and half-free. he he says he doesn't think the government has a say so in this even though he wants all free states.
</span><span>Does Douglas think we can continue to have some slave states and some free states?
he's saying that </span><span>each State being left free to decide for itself. SO in other words, he says that it's shouldn't be up to the gov, but up to the states.
i don't really know much about the part where is says. </span><span>Tell me about a historic idea that supports Douglas’ point of view on this. but i </span>hope that was some help, let me know if u have questions.
