Yes because he was able to move the people and talk to them in a way that they were moved
Answer:
1. If it were blm protesters, there would've been shoootings, deaths, tear gas, police officers punching and kicking protesters because the way America views and treats black people, minorities, and poc. They are treated as such that their life doesn't matter and white people are superior and more important.
2. The impact of yesterday's event at the capital proves that white privilge is real. They practically walked into the capital. The difference between that and blm protests is blm supporters are fighting for racial injustice and the trump supporters who raided and destroyed the capital are throwing tantrums cause trump lost. Especially the fact that the president of the US ENCOURAGED them to destroy and raid the capital. And many important people were inside and could've been killed like Mike Pence for instance. He put his on VP in danger. And the trump supporters at the capital were breaking the law by breaking in, smashing desks, stealing mail (which is fraud btw), and be all kinds of violent for what? because trump lost. And they only got treated a fraction of what blm supporters would've been treated
3. No i completely disagree with the methods of the "protesters" at the capital. They werent even protesters. They were criminals and rioters. Breaking the law. There are many other ways they could've done it. They could've simply had a peaceful protest like many BLM supporters did.
Explanation:
<span>Solomon Asch was able to
perform and experiment regarding the area of which the social pressure from a
majority group could affect the person to conform. In his experiment, he was able to found out
that the magnitude of the opposing majority influence the conformity of an
individual.</span>
Answer: There was a significant disillusion towards being able to assist Europeans and other nations in fighting off significant threats. At the same time, postwar disillusion in Europe resulted in a general rejection of the institutions and ideologies that plunged the continent into the worst of all wars.
Answer:
Missouri’s bid to become the first state west of the Mississippi River, and to allow slavery within its borders, set off a bitter debate in a Congress that was already divided into pro- and anti-slavery factions. During the debate, Rep. James Tallmadge of New York proposed an amendment to the statehood bill that would have eventually ended slavery in Missouri and set the existing enslaved workers there free. Southerners who opposed the Missouri Compromise did so because it set a precedent for Congress to make laws concerning slavery, while Northerners disliked the law because it meant slavery was expanded into new territory. Sorry I can't list everything this was an essay that I don't have anymore I'm just going off the top of my head.
Explanation:
