Answer:
Karl Marx and Adam Smith are both very different when it comes to their views about property ownership.
Explanation:
Adam Smith defends private property and considers it to be not only one of the pillars of the market system, but of civilization itself.
Karl Marx, on the other hand, understands the function of private property in society, but criticizes the tendency that private property has to accumulate in a few hands, a phenomenon also known as capital accumulation, which Marx identifies as one of the pillars of capitalism. For this reason, Marx proposes an alternative property system based on common ownership, and this system is known as communism.
Answer:
putoooooooooooooloooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Reasons:
- The Ottoman Empire had many ethnic tensions and nationalistic tendencies that weren't put down by the government, causing problems throughout the region.
- The Ottoman Empire's government was dysfunctional, and constantly arguing over how to run the empire and its government.
Explanation:
When The Ottoman Empire started to crumble, <em>Tsar Nicholas I of Russia referred to the Empire as a "very sick man"</em> in 1853, after that the nickname of the Ottoman Empire spread through the entire world.
<em>The Ottoman Empire was facing a big diversity of ethnic and religious groups </em>that started forming their own countries and where not friendly with each other, and their army was not strong enough to control those groups. <em>The Ottoman Empire survived because France and Britain defended them so that Russia would not take over the Empire</em>, not because of their government who was not able to support their population.
