1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kirill115 [55]
3 years ago
5

Adams said that photography cannot be "abstract." He prefers the word _____.

History
2 answers:
zheka24 [161]3 years ago
8 0

Its C,

Have a great day! :)

mixer [17]3 years ago
3 0
I'm not sure but extract is a synonym of abstract
You might be interested in
3. Is the minimum wage good or bad for the lowest-paid workers? Explain your reasoning.
svetoff [14.1K]

Answer: This is quite a complicated question and therefore requires quite a complicated and extensive answer.  While it may seem like a minimum wage is good for the lowest-paid workers it isn't very good for an economy and workers as a whole.  The reason for this being is that having a minimum wage and subsequently raising it (as is being done throughout the United States) boosts inflation meaning the price for products rises, (essentially negating all benefits that the workers received from a higher minimum wage.)  Now while the lowest class workers don't really receive any benefit from this as their wage goes up but the products they produce also go up in price as well, but the average middle class consumer gets hit hard by this as their product prices raise but they still have the same wage.  Another downside to having a minimum wage and having it consistently rising is that companies are forced to cut employees or not hire any more people all together.  This is why jobless claims rise after wages rise.  Companies cannot afford to pay workers a higher minimum wage and keep all their workers at the same time otherwise they would go in the red.  This forces them to make cuts in staffing.  Minimum wage would mandate that even if a potential worker and company agree on a price to pay for their work, the law would mandate that this would not be a possibility essentially making work harder to find.  Minimum wage should not even really be needed as companies and workers should be able to find a good and fair price for work on their own without the governments help.  If a worker doesn't like the wage they are receiving then they can quite and find a better paying job.  This also boosts competition among businesses as they are all fighting for workers to fill their jobs and would also raise the wage, but in a natural process without all the detriments that artificially raising the minimum wage brings.  Companies should be allowed to hire workers at whatever pay per hour they so what as long as it is agreed to as well by the worker.  This means that more jobs are open to a more wide variety of people and that also means that if people want to work for less they can still be open to that opportunity as well.

6 0
3 years ago
Active political participation by all citizens is the core of which political system
Step2247 [10]
The answer is Democracy because it is governed by citizens.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why would the basic nature of humans be a topic of discussion for these philosophers?(Thomas Hobbes,John Locke,Charles-Louis Mon
Reptile [31]

Answer: Jean-Jacques Rousseau was a Genevan philosopher, writer and composer. His political philosophy influenced the progress of the Enlightenment throughout Europe, as well as aspects of the French Revolution and the development of modern political, economic and educational thought.

Explanation:

Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712—1778)

Jean-Jacques Rousseau was one of the most influential thinkers during the Enlightenment in eighteenth century Europe. His first major philosophical work, A Discourse on the Sciences and Arts, was the winning response to an essay contest conducted by the Academy of Dijon in 1750. In this work, Rousseau argues that the progression of the sciences and arts has caused the corruption of virtue and morality. This discourse won Rousseau fame and recognition, and it laid much of the philosophical groundwork for a second, longer work, The Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. The second discourse did not win the Academy’s prize, but like the first, it was widely read and further solidified Rousseau’s place as a significant intellectual figure. The central claim of the work is that human beings are basically good by nature, but were corrupted by the complex historical events that resulted in present day civil society. Rousseau’s praise of nature is a theme that continues throughout his later works as well, the most significant of which include his comprehensive work on the philosophy of education, the Emile, and his major work on political philosophy, The Social Contract: both published in 1762. These works caused great controversy in France and were immediately banned by Paris authorities. Rousseau fled France and settled in Switzerland, but he continued to find difficulties with authorities and quarrel with friends. The end of Rousseau’s life was marked in large part by his growing paranoia and his continued attempts to justify his life and his work. This is especially evident in his later books, The Confessions, The Reveries of the Solitary Walker, and Rousseau: Judge of Jean-Jacques.

7 0
3 years ago
After the Muhammad died what was the purpose of the caliphs?
juin [17]

Answer:

The leader of a caliphate is called the caliph, meaning deputy or representative. All caliphs are believed to be the successor to Prophet Muhammad. ... Abu Bakr's supporters would come to be known as Sunni Muslims, who believe that Muhammad did not leave instructions regarding his successor.

Explanation:

He established a new unified Arabian Peninsula, which led to the Rashidun and Umayyad Caliphates and the rapid expansion of Muslim power over the next century, With additional support, Abu Bakr was confirmed as the first caliph (religious successor to Muhammad) that same year

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Essay Question: Did imperialism have more positive or negative effects on the United States? Be sure to use at least two pieces
tamaranim1 [39]

Answer:

Effects of Imperialism -

Imperialism is when a mother country takes over a smaller nation or colony for political, social, and/or economic reasons.  Imperialism has been a major force in shaping the modern world.  The effects of Imperialism have been interpreted from a variety of viewpoints.  This major Imperialism occurred during the late 19th Century and early 20th century.  It had more negative effects in the modern world today then positive effects.

A positive effect is seen in document one called "Modern Progressive Nations," it shows how the larger nations gave to the smaller colonies.  The nations built them roads, canals, and railways.  Showed them the telegraph, newspaper, established schools for them, gave them the blessing of their civilization, and overall made them economized.  They were part of modern culture after this occurred.  Another positive effect is seen in document three called "Colonial Governments and Missionaries. " It shows how the colonial governments introduced improved medical care, and better methods of sanitation.  There were new crops; tools and farming methods, which helped, increase food production.  These changes meant less death to smaller colonies, and overall improve the state of living.  They now could live longer and have better sanitation compared to the earlier imperialism.

A negative effect is seen document two-called "Colonization."  In the picture you can see that the colonies doing the mother countrys hard work did not civilize the smaller colonies.  They were put to work as cheap labor.  They had no freedom, had to do what the mother country said since it has so much towering power over them, they were exploited and were taken advantage of.  Another negative effect is seen in document four called "Missionaries."  In this quote you can see that when the white people came to the Africans they had nothing but power over them.  They came with the Bible and no land, and instead took their land and forced the religion Christianity upon them.   In document five-called "The White Man," another negative effect occurs.  In this little tale or quote, David Diop talks about how the whites came and killed the innocent.  This had many negative effects on Africa such as the African's were put to work as slaves but more like cheap labor.  Many of them dies from this, they were resettled, exploited, weren't taken at their free will and took all of their land.  The last negative effect can be seen in document seven called "The German Cartoon." This cartoon shows how severely the presence of imperialism affected such continents as Africa.  The man in the machine is being forced to drink hard liquor and alcohol, they were corrupted and given evil minds, their money was all taken away, and most of all religion was forced upon them.

Imperialism is never considered as a good cause and effect.  At first when it occurs it may seem as a positive effect, but in the long run, for example in this case it was a negative effect.  All Africans and Asians were heavily exploited and were given no rights to do anything even though the mother countries gave them modern culture.  Colonies inside colonies would fight because they wanted independence and have their own government and rule.  There were many ethnics group that had nationalistic feelings but could not accomplish anything and become a free nation because of Imperialism.  The mother country's that did the taking over were only after a few things and unfortunately did happen to accomplish what they were after.  They wanted raw materials, markets for goods, national glory, balance of power and they also felt as though they needed to help smaller nations as though it was their burden, which Europeans called "White Man's Burden."  In their point of view they thought they were helping people but really all they were doing was hurting the smaller colonies.  Mother countries were destroying ethnic groups and causing civil wars between smaller nations.  This newer modern Imperialism was never productive.  

When a mother country took over a smaller colony for economic, political or social reason, they were Imperialistic.  As shown they changed the modern world plenty and pretty much made it a harder world to live in at that time.  It all depends on which viewpoints you may look at.  Some may think it was a positive thing but overall, it only led to things in this world that were negative.  Even thought the modern Imperialism occurred no more then 100 years ago, it still affects us greatly, and how our nation is broken down.

Explanation:

there's your essay

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How was George Washington's experience different in the French and Indian War and the American Revolutionary War?
    12·1 answer
  • Which group of people did the First Emperor order to move to the capital?
    10·1 answer
  • Definition: This was a federally sponsored corporation which insures deposits in national banks and certain other qualifying fin
    9·2 answers
  • Which idea comes from the enlightenment and is reflected in the constitution
    13·2 answers
  • Who did Jacques Cartier sail for?
    10·2 answers
  • Which map projection is often used to show polar regions? Enter the correct letter in the box.
    10·1 answer
  • Look at the map below. The countries that colonized the Americas during the 15th through 18th centuries came mostly from which r
    7·1 answer
  • Chinese philosophies were born out of A.conflict B.Peace C.religion or D.meditation
    13·2 answers
  • According to Christians, what must they receive from the church, in order to be spiritually saved?
    14·1 answer
  • What event is Grady referring to when he says, “as you invaded ours twenty-nine years ago”?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!