1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AveGali [126]
3 years ago
8

Why was James I resistant to working with Parliament?

History
2 answers:
Sati [7]3 years ago
8 0

<em><u>James, I resisted working with Parliament as he believed in the absolute power of kings. </u></em>

Further Explanations:  

James, I was the King of England and also the first monarchs of England to rule England till his death. Being a well-educated person he encouraged people of England to take interest in things such as science, arts, and literature. In the case of political prospect, he often had conflicts with the Parliament due to his belief that King should be the Supreme authority. He opposed the House of Commons and referred that Freedom of Speech states that the commons had no rights to debate in his foreign policies. His views were ignored and a war against Spain which planned that displeased James. Member of the Parliament believed that debate on this topic will make Parliament obsolete.

His views created a sense of hatred against him in the minds of citizens and a conspiracy was planned to assassinate him. The plot was put to halt when one of the conspirators, Guy Fawkes was caught in the basement of the Parliament along with barrels of gunpowder.  

Learn More

1. Which of these was one of the few successes of the United States government under the articles of confederation? <u>brainly.com/question/6639139 </u>

2. Why did Pope Gregory vii and henry iv come into conflict? <u>brainly.com/question/1546461 </u>

3. Which explains why Supreme Court justices are given lifetime appointments?

<u>brainly.com/question/701144 </u>

Answer Details:

Grade: High school

Subject: US History

Chapter: Bill of Rights

Keywords: James I, King, England, science, arts, and literature, Parliament, Supreme, authority, Bill of rights, British Parliament, Catholics, conspirators, Guy Fawkes

larisa86 [58]3 years ago
4 0
<span>This was a declaration by the House of Commons of England reaffirming their right to freedom of speech in the face of King James' belief that they had no right to debate foreign policy. Many Members of Parliament were unhappy with James' foreign policy. They opposed the Spanish Match and wished for a war against Spain. The MPs believed that if they conceded that they had no right to debate matters which displeased the King, Parliament would be obsolete</span>
You might be interested in
How does Australia ensure that their citizen show up to vote
sukhopar [10]

Australia uses alot of forms of voting for most of all elections. voters are the number the candidates on the ballot paper in the order of their preference.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Peyton Riley Armstrong<br> Bral<br> Which branch confirms Presidential appointments?
ivolga24 [154]
The legislative branch must approve any Presidental appointments unless a veto is used.
5 0
3 years ago
Why was Hitler obsessed with blond-haired, blue-eyed women?
Licemer1 [7]

Answer:

Blonde hair and blue eyes was the Nazi ideal. Actually, as an ideal, it has never been, nor is now, limited to them. But anyway, it was just that, an ideal. Some Germans had those features, and were Praised. But for the ones who didn't, it Really wasn't a big deal. They didn't really divided the world into blondes and everyone else, that is a myth.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which describes the main reason Georgia’s capital moved so many times?
andrezito [222]

Answer:

B is the answer

Explanation:

Bc it just it

8 0
3 years ago
15. What were the principles of Roman Law? How do you see their influence on today’s law? (4 points) (5 sentences please)
andrew11 [14]
First Question Answer:
<span>1) All citizens had the right to equal treatment under law.

2) A person was considered innocent until proven guilty.

3) The burden of proof rested with the accuser rather than the accused.

4) Any law that seemed unreasonable or grossly unfair could be set aside




</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which was not a principle that Jawaharial Nehru and Gandhi would have supported?
    5·2 answers
  • In 1095, Pope Urban II called for Christians to take back the Holy Land from the Muslims. After a series of Crusades, the Christ
    9·1 answer
  • The Joseon Dynasty of Korea was one of the world’s longest lasting _____.
    7·2 answers
  • While roughly the same nations were involved, the reasons why were different world war i and world war 2?
    5·1 answer
  • What estates did philip iv include in the first french parliament?
    15·1 answer
  • What is one way cities were different from villages?
    8·2 answers
  • Lewis and Clark’s journey was mostly upriver or downriver?
    6·1 answer
  • What are the positive and negative effects of negotiating treaties to solve difficulties
    14·1 answer
  • Describe President Hoover's reaction at the start of the Great Depression.
    13·1 answer
  • List four possible causes of the French Revolution
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!