Answer:
When studying the history of Central America one must first clarify just what Central America is. Today (2019) it is commonly taken to include Guatemala, Belize, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama. This definition matches modern political borders. However, in some senses and at some times Central America begins in Mexico, at the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, and the former country of Yucatán was part of Central America. At the other end, before its independence in 1903 Panama was politically and culturally part of the South American country of Colombia, or its predecessors. At times English-speaking Belize, with a quite different history, has been considered as apart from Central America.
Political Evolution of Central America and the Caribbean from 1700 to present
Contemporary political map of Central America
Long and narrow, Central America does not have an obvious center from a geographic point of view. While Guatemala has been historically and religiously a leader, other regions have been unwilling to be part of a confederation based in Guatemala. The geography has made the region hard to govern from any central point. The countries, furthermore, are more diverse than they appear at first glance. Some (Guatemala) have a large indigenous or Native American population, others (Costa Rica) do not. Some (El Salvador) are focused on their Pacific coast, while in others (Belize, Honduras) the Caribbean or Atlantic coast is more important. Panama and to a lesser extent Guatemala and Costa Rica have both coasts playing a significant role. Panama is heavily Americanized, uses the US dollar as its currency, has a large industry and source of revenue (the canal), and a sophistication which comes from the ships passing through the country and previously the U.S. military installations in the Canal Zone.
Let's solve your problem:
The answer is option - had less cultural output than the Romans.
Compared to the rest of Medieval Europe, Rome had more cultural output than any other country in the world at that time.
I believe the answer is 3. <span>it spelled the end of many economic opportunities for both groups
During the world war I, many people were obligated into millitary draft and went to the war. When this happen, factories and other busineses in home soil experienced a lack of workers, so many women and african americans had the opportunity to try and operate factories and busineses in the home soils.
When the world war I ended, the men took back the control of the factories and busineses</span>
Answer:
Separation of powers is a political doctrine originating in the writings of Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu in The Spirit of the Laws, in which he argued for a constitutional government with three separate branches, each of which would have defined abilities to check the powers of the others.
Explanation:
hope this helps
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that the net incomes of much of the US population was increasing greatly during this time, thanks to the economic "boom" of the 1920s. </span></span><span />
