I think it would be because he didn't want to be too overpowered for the sake of it, also so the next in his spot wouldn't take things past the limit and cause damage to the area around. Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
Scientific inquiry is what differentiate history from myths, and popular folk tales.
Explanation:
History refers to the empirical study of past events and the most important thing is the right approach while reconstructing the past phenomenons else one tends to end at the wrong conclusion. While studying history researchers not only look for sources but also critically examined the socio-political situation in which the source was created. And therefore one needs to apply scientific methods to cross-examine different historical sources before reaching a conclusion.
What was the same in the Mayan, Aztec and Inca civilizations?
The civilizations of the Maya, Aztec, and Inca that once flourished in Central and South America shared common elements. People practiced farming, developed social structures, raised armies, and worshipped many gods. The three civilizations were as diverse as the terrains in which they lived.
What was different in the Mayan, Aztec and Inca civilizations?
The vast Incan Empire had a central government that established laws, developed a complex road system, planned cities, and created farmlands along the sides of mountains. Unlike the Aztecs and the Maya, the Inca did not develop a writing system.
Answer:
Judicial interpretation refers to different ways that the judiciary uses to interpret the law, particularly constitutional documents and legislation. As a result, how justices interpret the constitution, and the ways in which they approach this task has a political aspect.
The Equal Rights Amendment
The Equal Rights Amendment, formulated as early as 1923 by the National Women's Party, proposed that "e<span>quality of rights under the law shall not be abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex." When feminist groups in the 1960s and 1970s pushed for Congress to propose this as an amendment to the Constitution, conservatives such as Schlafly opposed it. The House of Representatives gave its approval in 1970; the Senate did so in 1972. The next step was ratification by the states. But the campaign against the amendment led by Schlafly contributed to its demise, failing to achieve ratification. A key point Schlafly focused on was that women would then be subject to military draft and military combat service in the same way as men, and this became the key issue regarding the defeat of the Equal Rights Amendment.</span>