Answer: Top-down approach
Explanation:
Top-down approach is the scenario where an information is analysed from the high rated information to lower ones. Most times this is used to determine the best from a test. The HR having understood that the best would be better on the job will have to use a Top-down approach to screen out the best candidates and qualify them to do the job.
The significance of the Passover is to celebrate how we have been freed by God. Remembrance of what God did for use. For the Israelites blood signified life. The blood from the Paschal Lamb meant that death would passover their house.
Answer:
Intelligence testing seems most useful
Explanation:
Intelligence testing is one of the oldest forms of classifying and categorizing intelligence in humans. This is done in children to detect learning disabilities and in adults to diagnose neurological/degenerative diseases that affect the brain and learning.
On the other hand Standardized tests such as the ACT and SAT are highly controversial since it does not really measure the worth of a student but the performance of the school/district. Most of these schools end up training students on how to pass a standardized tests rather than learning and enhancing intelligence.
High school grades cannot be taken into account since ever meter is different in each high school from state to state and country to country. This is the logic for standardized tests.
Colleges and universities should look at a student's overall accomplishments, their work and their goal. They must also factor in any obstacle that the student had in their way because this also requires time and energy to overcome.
All of the work as a whole should be taken together rather than a single part. This would not reflect the entirety of the student's potential or intelligence.
Answer:
English colonies in North America were business ventures. They provided an outlet for England's surplus population and (in some cases) more religious freedom than England did, but their primary purpose was to make money for their sponsors.
Explanation:
Egyptians were better off with a democratically elected regime. The benefits of a democracy by far surpasses the excesses of a military dictatorship, in that in a democracy, freedoms and liberties are protected.
however, the Egyptian situation was different because the democratically elected president became the enemy of freedoms and liberties such as freedom to worship, and promoted radical brotherhood views.
the problem was with the way the transition was handled, as the military ought to have let parliament or the people decide the course of society. the problem, however is, with religion such as Islam the achievement of the democratic ideals is a long shot?
