What was the result of the Supreme Court decision for Worcester v. Georgia? It required white men to leave the Indians' lands in
Georgia. It required Indians to stay at the white man's lands in Georgia. It required white men to stay at the Indians' lands in Georgia. It required all men to leave all lands in Georgia. It required Indians to leave the white man's lands in Georgia.
The Supreme Court in Worcester v. Georgia analyzed that the Cherokee Nation was considered a separate political entity that could not be run by the state. Georgia's license law was illegitimate, and Worcester's conviction should be overturned. Dating back of early colonial America, the Native American communities were conceived of as "separate nations,” the Court first pointed to evidence. The Court then claimed that today's "treaties and laws of the United States [also] contemplate the Indian territory separated from that of the states, and provide that all intercourse with them shall be carried on exclusively by the government of the union."
That is why the United States can negotiate the terms of Indian lands and the use of thence. States were shortfalls of constitutional power to deal with such "nations" at all. Thus, Georgia could not pass the license law. Moreover, it also could not convict Worcester for violation of the law.
It would be the "legislative branch" that is divided into two separate chambers--one is called the Senate and the other is called the House of Representatives. This is called a "bicameral" legislature.
