1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
k0ka [10]
3 years ago
10

Barrum Owners is a group that consists of people who own Barrum motorbikes. The members of the group meet every month for member

s-only rides and other events. The group also has online forums where the members hold discussions. Given the information, Barrum Owners is an example of a(n) _____.A. informal community
B. brand community
C. aspirational group
D. primary group
Business
1 answer:
OLEGan [10]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The correct answer is B. brand community .

Explanation:

A brand community refers to a group of people who share a strong liking for a brand and create teams to share and discuss its usefulness, use it, and serve as an advertisement to others. In the case of Barrum motorcycles, its brand community is mainly made up of bikers who make trips and events to publicize the benefits of using their motorcycles.

You might be interested in
A quantity of inventory that provides protection against lost sales caused by unfulfilled demands from customers is called:_____
s2008m [1.1K]

Answer:

e) Safety stock.

Explanation:

The term that describes this form of safety-net for companies is called safety stock. Companies tend to have this in order to be able to maintain their business flow as efficiently as possible in case there are unforeseen increases in demand. Otherwise, if demand drastically increases and they do not have this safety stock the company will run out of stock immediately and lose out on sales as they wait for more stock to arrive, which can also cause that stock to sell out immediately due to the backed-up demand, which can lead to the business buying backed up for months.

5 0
3 years ago
On an organization's board of directors, inside directors ____; outside directors _____. are supposed to be elected from outside
BigorU [14]
On an organization's board of directors, inside directors <span>may be members of the firm; outside directors </span><span>are supposed to be elected from outside the firm.</span>
The board of directors is responsible for keeping the organization’s vision, mission, and strategic planning goals. Duties of boards include: <span>choosing the CEO, approving major policies, making major decisions, overseeing performance<span>, and serving as external advocate.</span></span>
4 0
4 years ago
Two firms, A and B, each currently emit 100 tons of chemicals into the air. The government has decided to reduce the pollution a
LekaFEV [45]

Answer:

It is likely that <em>C. Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200</em>.

Explanation:

  • So <em>two firms, A and B, each currently emit 100 tons</em><em> of chemicals into the air, and from now on each one will require </em><em>a pollution permit for each ton</em><em> of pollution emitted into the air</em>.
  • <em>Each firm gets 40 pollution permits</em><em>, which it can</em><em> either use or sell </em><em>to the other firm</em>. That means that if both firms choose to keep their respective 40 permits, they would still have to reduce the pollution by 60 tons (100 minus 40 is 60).
  • <em>It costs Firm A $200 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates</em><em> before it is emitted into the air</em>. Because it costs so much to eliminate a ton of pollution, it would make sense for Firm A to get as many pollution permits as possible, <u>as long as they get them for less than $200 each</u>.
  • It costs Firm B $100 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it is emitted into the air. Since here it costs less to eliminate a ton of pollution, it would make sense for Firm B to sell as many pollution permits as possible, <u>as long as they sell for higher than $100</u>.

With that in mind, the outcome that makes the most sense would be <em>Option C. Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200</em>. This way both firms spend the least amount of money while at the same time pleasing the government.

To demonstrate it, let's do some actual calculations for each case.

Case A) Both firms will use their own pollution permits.

In this case, each firm will have to independently reduce their pollutants by 60 tons, as noted before. That represents a high cost, as we will now determine:

For Firm A, the cost would be

60tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton}=12000dollars

For Firm B, the cost would be

60tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton}=6000dollars

Case B) Firm A will buy some of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost less than $100.

Since Firm B could spend $100 to reduce a ton of pollution, it wouldn't sell its pollution permits for less than $100 each: <em>If Firm B sold its pollution permits for less than $100 each, it would have to reduce even more tons of pollutants (spending $100 for each one), and </em><em>would end up losing money</em>! Let's say it sold 10 pollution permits for $90 each, so it would have to reduce 70 tons of pollutants instead of 60. Its total cost would be:

Cost for Firm B (Case B):

70tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton}-(10*90dollars)=6100dollars

Which is higher than the cost calculated for Firm B in Case A, so it's not worth it.

Case D) Firm B will buy all of Firm A's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200.

This is a similar case than Case B, in the sense that since it costs Firm A so much to reduce a ton of pollutant ($200 for each one), it wouldn't sell its pollution permits for less than $200 each, <em>or it would end up losing money as well</em>. Let's say Firm A sold all of its 40 pollution permits for $150 each, and so it would have to reduce 100 tons of pollutants instead of 60. Its total cost would be:

Cost for Firm A (Case D):

100tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton}-(40*150dollars)=14000dollars

Which is higher than the cost calculated for Firm A in Case A, so it's not worth it.

Finally, Case C) Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200.

As mentioned before, this one makes the most sense because both firms would spend the least amount of money. Let's determine the total costs for each one, knowing that:

  • Firm A would buy 40 pollutant permits from Firm B, for (let's say) $150 each.
  • Firm A would still need to reduce 20 tons of pollutants. And
  • Firm B would have to reduce 100 tons of pollutants, instead of 60.

Cost for Firm A (Case C):

(20tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton})+(40*150dollars)=10000dollars

Which is less than the $12000 Cost calculated in Case A.

Cost for Firm B (Case C):

(100tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton})-(40*150dollars)=4000dollars

Which is less than the $6000 Cost calculated in Case A.

<em>Since both firms each spend $2000 less in Case C than in case A, it would make sense for them to follow this option</em>.

4 0
3 years ago
Google stock has a beta of 1.39. The risk free rate in the economy is 2.00% while the market portfolio risk premium is 7.00%. Go
salantis [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

first of all we need to identify required rate of return

as per the given date in the question we can apply Capita asset pricing model to identify the Ke that is cost of equity.

We have

Ke = Rf+(Rm-Rf)*beta

Ke=2%+(7%-2%)*1.39

Ke=2%+(5%)*1.39

Ke=2%+6.95

Ke=8.95

Now we need to identify the share price after five year with same return

Share price =  862*(1+8.95%)^5

Share price after five year = 1323.255

8 0
3 years ago
If consideration is received before a contract is identified and the consideration is nonrefundable, revenue may be recognized i
Studentka2010 [4]

Answer: Any of these answer choice is correct.

Explanation:

You didn't put the options to the question. The options are:

• There is no remaining obligation to transactions goods.

• The contract has been terminated.

• Goods have been delivered.

• Any of these answer choice is correct.

When consideration has been received before a contract is identified and the consideration is nonrefundable, then the revenue may be recognized when:

• There is no remaining obligation to transactions goods.

• The contract has been terminated.

• Goods have been delivered

Therefore, the correct option is any of the answer choice is correct.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1. On January 10, Molly Amise uses her Blossom Company credit card to purchase merchandise from Blossom Company for $1,900.
    6·1 answer
  • Electronic data interchanges, once limited by operating system incompatibility, have found new life due to:
    6·1 answer
  • Brenda and Tim went to Carl's Custom Dining to buy a new dining room set. At the store they configured the set to their specific
    15·1 answer
  • If the standardized budget shows a deficit of about $100 billion and the actual budget shows a deficit of about $150 billion, it
    12·2 answers
  • Although equity theory suggests that both partners who are overbenefited and underbenefited feel uncomfortable, the partner who
    13·1 answer
  • Corrective taxes are typically advocated to correct for the effects ofA. positive externalities.B. patents.C. negative externali
    15·1 answer
  • In the context of group decision making, which of the following is a difference between the nominal group technique (NGT) and th
    9·1 answer
  • Which goal is an example of a measurable goal
    8·2 answers
  • Billboard advertising is most effective for __________ advertising.
    10·1 answer
  • A limited liability partnership allows professionals to avoid personal liability for the malpractice of other partners. Group of
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!