1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marianna [84]
3 years ago
11

Which situation was similar for both the settlers of Jamestown and Plymouth?

History
2 answers:
suter [353]3 years ago
4 0
One situation that was similar for both the settlers of Jamestown and Plymouth was "<span>B) the hardships they suffered," since these colonies existed in very inhospitable and deadly environments. </span>
MissTica3 years ago
3 0

The answer is B. The harships they suffered

You might be interested in
Why would France be more interested in the northern areas of America
kaheart [24]
France would be ,more interested in the northern areas of America because of the availability of fur. During the time of colonization by the French, fur trade generated immense amount of profit. This attracted the French more. I hope that this is the answer that has actually come to your desired help.<span />
4 0
3 years ago
How did European nations come to rule most of Africa, despite the presence of strong African kindoms
Kruka [31]
Europeans were the first to make guns & this is why not only they conquered African countries but also most of South America.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The English Bill of Rights was passed as a means to....
mamaluj [8]

Answer:

Explanation:

The English Bill of Rights created a constitutional monarchy in England, meaning the king or queen acts as head of state but his or her powers are limited by law. Under this system, the monarchy couldn't rule without the consent of Parliament, and the people were given individual rights.

hope this helps

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In this unit, you learned that Oklahoma experienced a great deal of change in the late
vampirchik [111]

Answer:

Explanation:The dawn of the twentieth century found the region between Kansas and Texas in transition. Once set aside as a permanent home for indigenous and uprooted American Indians, almost two million acres of Indian Territory had been opened to settlement in 1889. Joined with a strip of land above the Texas Panhandle, the two areas were designated "Oklahoma Territory" by an act of Congress the following year. Subsequent additions of land surrendered by tribal governments increased the new territory until it was roughly equal in size to the diminished Indian Territory. Land was the universal attraction, but many white pioneers who rushed into Oklahoma Territory or settled in Indian Territory hoped for a fresh start in a new Eden not dominated by wealth and corporate power. Freedmen dreamed of a new beginning in a place of social justice where rights guaranteed by the Constitution would be respected. Most Native Americans, whose land was being occupied, had come to realize the futility of their opposition to the process that would soon unite the two territories into a single state. A few Indians, most wedded to tribal traditions, simply ignored a process they could not understand and refused to participate in an allotment of land they had once been promised would be theirs "forever."

The birth of the new state occurred in an era of protest and reform. Populist and Progressive currents merged to sweep reform-minded Democrats to an overwhelming victory in 1906 in the selection of delegates to a Constitutional Convention tasked with forging Indian and Oklahoma territories and the Osage Nation into a single state. The constitution drafted at the convention in Guthrie in 1906–07 was not as "radical" as Pres. Theodore Roosevelt suggested, but it did reflect its authors' belief that the will of the people, not powerful corporations, should determine state policy. A series of provisions, including a corporation commission, popular election of many state officials, initiative and referendum, preferential balloting for U.S. senators, a single term for the governor, a weak legislature, and inclusion of details in the constitution normally enacted by statute, reflected the founding fathers' conviction that corporate influence on state government should be held in check.

5 0
3 years ago
What caused the great famine in the ukraine under stalin?.
lisov135 [29]

Stalin's regime proceeded to eliminate the scholars of Ukraine, forcibly deport Ukrainian Kulaks who fought its collectivization policies, and produce planned mass hunger by the hunger of Ukrainians, wherever they were found throughout the Soviet Empire.  

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did Thomas Jefferson resist building a larger navy to fight British impressment of American sailors?
    9·2 answers
  • Which natural resources of Southeast Asia is used in making pencils
    14·2 answers
  • Look at the map, which feature does the highlighted area on the map show?
    8·2 answers
  • This is the other side of the extract
    5·1 answer
  • What amendment gave women the right to vote in 1920
    7·2 answers
  • How did america's involvement in world war ii differ from its participation in world war i? consider diplomacy, allied and enemi
    13·1 answer
  • I regret deeply any injuries that may have been done in the course of the events that led to this decision. I would say only tha
    11·2 answers
  • Where was Michael Faraday Born ?
    9·2 answers
  • The Second Industrial Revolution was sparked by the development of
    14·1 answer
  • If you break a US law, in what court will your case begin
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!