Monroe was constantly objecting to the fact that the constitution did not explicitly mention or provide for spending the money of the government on road and canal projects (which he believed were very essential projects at that time).
Therefore, Monroe consistently vetoed the acts of the congress for providing the funds that are to be used on such projects.
On the other hands, other states were left to do any internal improvements on their own.
The war in Europe was given more importance by the Allied strategists than the fight in the Pacific or any of the other areas of the conflict.
This is further explained below.
<h3>Who
are Allied strategists?</h3>
Generally, the American military plan called for an "island hopping" operation, in which the US would seize islands closer to Japan and use them as bases for air strikes on Japan, as well as cut off Japanese supplies via submarine warfare against Japanese commerce.
In conclusion, The fighting in Europe was accorded a higher priority by the Allied strategists than the battle in the Pacific or any of the other theaters of the war combined.
Read more about Allied strategists
brainly.com/question/12538368
#SPJ1
Answer:
The Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union had broad implications on the American homefront. Old fears and prejudices were rekindled and the new, very real, threat of nuclear war impacted public policies as well as the daily lives of people across the country.
Explanation:
hope this helps you :)
It would be between increased population, a steady stream of agricultural production, and technological advancements. As for the most important one of those three; that would be agricultural production.
Answer:
B. Suspicious.
Explanation:
Since the times of the First Continental Congress, there were debates about the role and the weight of a central government. Colonists appreciated self-rule and large autonomy and many people, both before and after the peace with Britain in 1783, were afraid of creating a strong central government; some even feared that a too powerful president could become a tyrant.
