A country that has high political freedom typically offers
high economic freedom.
<span><span>Part of a series on</span>LiberalismSchools[show]Ideas[hide]<span>Civil and political rightsCultural liberalism<span>Democracy <span>Liberal democracy </span></span>Economic liberalismEgalitarianismFree marketFree tradeFreedom of the pressFreedom of religionFreedom of speechGender equalityHarm principleInternationalismLaissez-faireLibertyMarket economyNatural and legal rights<span>Negative / positive liberty</span>Open societyPermissive societyPrivate propertyRule of lawSecularismSeparation of church and stateSocial contractWelfare state</span>Variants[show]People[show]Organizations[show]Regional variants[show]Related topics[show]<span><span> Liberalism portal</span><span> Politics portal</span></span><span>vte</span></span>
Political freedom (also known as <span>political autonomy</span> or political agency) is a central concept in history and political thought and one of the most important features of democratic societies.Political freedom was described as freedom from oppression or coercion, the absence of disabling conditions for an individual and the fulfillment of enabling conditions, or the absence of life conditions of compulsion, e.g. economic compulsion, in a society. Although political freedom is often interpreted negatively as the freedom from unreasonable external constraints on action, it can also refer to the positive exercise of rights, capacities and possibilities for action, and the exercise of social or group rights. The concept can also include freedom from "internal" constraints on political action or speech (e.g. social conformity, consistency, or "inauthentic" behaviour). The concept of political freedom is closely connected with the concepts of civil liberties and human rights, which in democratic societies are usually afforded legal protection from the state.
You put in cause #1 one thing that happened in the event and in effect #1 whatever happened say what that did for example say someone dropped skittles the effect would be a mess was made and then do the same for the 2nd case and effect
John Rockefeller moved 60%of all oil till he build his pipe line that cause the railroad to collapse
In short, suppression and eradication.
The Protestants of the early United States tended to avoid marrying and continuing the bloodlines of Native Americans due to obvious racial tension and prejudice against them. Native Americans were eradicated on a larger scale in North America rather than South America, so there would be a greater amount of Natives there. (This is because of a more complex and somehow tolerant society in the South) However, there were obviously the mestizos. While there <em>was </em>reproduction between white people and natives, it was typically a result of harassment or an uncommon desire to start a family.
In summary, the amount of Native descendants in the United States is significantly lower now than centuries before because of endless eradication and little amounts of pure-blood Native Americans being born.
Mommy poop balls ur hole fart balls
