The difference between bacteria and viruses that show bacteria are living and not viruses is that viruses, unlike bacteria, lack what is considered a living organism. For Example, viruses cannot reproduce without the help of a host, and don't use the normal way of cell-division for replication. Unlike bacteria, which can reproduce without the aid of a host.
So basically viruses don't have what it need to be a living organism, like reproducing without and host and aren't in the norm for cell-division for replication.
Answer:yes of course if we don’t the environment will die and undiscovered animals will become extinct and we can’t discover them till it’s too late and those polar bears are on thin ice and it’s not fair to them that they have to suffer for our choices
Explanation:
1. Objective
2. Objective
3. Opinionated
4. Objective
5. Opinionated
6. Opinionated
7. Objective
8. Opinionated
I think this is answer but i'm not sure it is right or wrong 3+14= 17
True. if thats what you're looking for
