1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vedmedyk [2.9K]
3 years ago
7

Which of the following statements best describes President Lincoln’s plan for reconstruction

History
1 answer:
laila [671]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: I think you put it on the right answer BBBB.

Explanation: I not totally for sure but that sounds like the best answer.

You might be interested in
Why is the Rules Committee in the House of Representatives powerful? Choose 1 answer: Choose 1 answer: (Choice A) A because it d
hichkok12 [17]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

because it decides who will be the speaker of the house

5 0
3 years ago
Explain the rational as to why people created government
nata0808 [166]

Answer:

Explanation:

Problem Solving

Identifying Basic Rights

Think of a right you believe all people should have. For example, you probably agree that everyone in the United States has the right to be protected from robbers and burglars. The belief that everyone should have this protection is shared by most people in the United States. We hear about it on television, in the newspaper, and in discussions.

Individually or in small groups, explain how you think rights like the one you have identified can be protected.

Defining "Natural Rights"

Most people in the American colonies believed that everyone had a right to life, liberty, and property. These rights were called natural rights. (Sometimes these are now called basic rights or fundamental rights.) The idea of natural rights means that all persons have these rights just because they are human beings. Everyone is born with these rights and they should not be taken away without a person's agreement.

Many of the Founders believed people receive these rights from God. Others believed that people have them just because it is natural for people to have them.

John Locke was a famous English philosopher. He lived from 1632 to 1704. He had written a book called Two Treatises of Civil Government (1690). In that book he wrote about natural rights. He said that the main purpose of government should be to protect the people's natural rights. He also said that kings should not have absolute power, that is, power without limits. They should not be able to deprive people of their natural rights.

Many Americans had read Locke's book, and they agreed with what it said about government. Those who had not actually read Locke's book knew his ideas from newspapers, political pamphlets, church sermons, and discussions.

Protecting Natural Rights

Although people agreed on certain natural rights, they worried about how those rights could be protected. Locke and others thought about what life would be like in a situation where there was no government and no laws. They called this situation a state of nature. They were afraid that in a state of nature their rights would be taken away.

Think what your classroom might be like if there were no rules.

Problem Solving

It's your turn to think like a philosopher

Imagine what life might be like in a state of nature. Think what your classroom might be like if there were no rules. Think what might happen if the teacher didn't have the right to tell anyone what to do.

Work together in groups of about five to answer the following questions about such a situation. Then choose a person to explain your answers to the rest of the class. Then compare your answers with John Locke's which follow.

What might be the advantages and disadvantages of living in a state of nature?

What might happen to people's rights?

What might life be like for everyone?

Compare Your List with John Locke's

You may have seen the same disadvantages in a state of nature that John Locke saw. Locke believed:

The stronger and smarter people might try to take away other people's lives, liberty, or property.

Weaker people might band together and take away the rights of the stronger and smarter people.

People would be unprotected and insecure.

The Social Compact

John Locke and other philosophers developed a solution to the problems that exist in a place without government. In a state of nature, people might feel free to do anything they want to do. However, their rights would not be protected and they would feel insecure.

Locke argued that people should agree with one another to give up some of their freedom in exchange for protection and security. They should consent to follow some laws in exchange for the protection that these laws would give them. This agreement is called a social compact or social contract. A social compact is an agreement people make among themselves to create a government to rule them and protect their natural rights. In this agreement the people consent to obey the laws created by that government.

In a later lesson, you will study the Declaration of Independence. You will see how the Founders included all of the ideas you have studied in this lesson in the Declaration.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A certificate sold to citizens by a government in order to help pay for a war. War Effort Trenches War Bond Propaganda
Harrizon [31]
WarBond I believe is the correct answer. 
7 0
3 years ago
1. Poverty is more than an economic problem, its a source of social discontent and political <br>​
raketka [301]

fun fact really sad fact

4 0
2 years ago
If the price of copper rises, which of the following may occur?
Daniel [21]

Answer:

The correct option is B, the profits of copper produces increase

Explanation:

Assuming copper is price inelastic, meaning the rise in price would not impact the quantity demanded significantly, the revenue of the suppliers increase and as a result the bottom-line( profits) recorded by the suppliers increase.

A price increase cannot bring about reduction in quantity supplied ads increase in price is an incentive to supply more, hence option A is wrong.

Option C is totally out of context as well as option D

The government is not the one producing the copper let alone increase the content of the copper

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • He was a lawyer who served as u.s. solicitor general under president john
    13·1 answer
  • What was the main way in which imperialist nations protected their colonies and trade in the 1800s?
    15·1 answer
  • Do you think Andrew Jackson should be on the $20 bill
    5·1 answer
  • Who would be most likely to contest USMCA?
    12·2 answers
  • Who recognized Jesus first after Jesus helped the Apostles catch the 153 fish?
    14·1 answer
  • BRAINLIEST
    7·2 answers
  • What was the Fugitive Slave Act? How did the abolitionist movement change after the Fugitive Slave Act?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a benefit of international trade?
    11·1 answer
  • How many members of the family were required to do farm work?​
    7·1 answer
  • Which two of the following deserts are located in parts of Africa?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!