The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions on who electors can vote for.
I agree with this decision because voting in the Electoral College is a serious thing, and members of the college have to assume this important and serious role. That is why they are members of the Electoral College and expressed their intention to vote for the candidate they supported.
I think there would be no room for faithless electors in the US Electoral College. There is no reason for them to vote for other people if they originally pledge to vote for their candidates.
On July 6, 2020, the case of Chiafalo v. Washington was decided.
Racism in the 17th Century. While the 17th century did not have systematic notions of racial difference, colonialism led to the development of social and political institutions, such as slavery in the New World, that were later justified through racial theories
The two main factor that aided America's victory in the Revolution was the distance between Britain and American and support from the French. Since the war was fought in America, the Americans were on home soil and knew it better. It also meant that the British would have to travel across the Atlantic and retreat back for supplies and more men, which was quite inconvenient. However, the main reason for the victory was France's naval assistance and aid towards the end of the war. The British had one of the best navies at the time, it wasn't until the French helped out and assisted in the war that America was able to gain victory.
