its NOT D!!! Thanks for misleading me, after studying the material I found the correct answer to be A! I just took the PF keys to success test, trust me
Answer:
the approval was already anticipated by the market
Explanation:
This abnormal return of 0% suggests that the approval was already anticipated by the market. Meaning that the price of the Pharma company's stock had already been affected by the speculation previously and when the FDA made the announcement investors had already made their move in the market with regards to Pharma's stock. Thus causing no further move and a return of 0% to occur.
Answer:
1. Dr Cash 665
Cr Advance from customer 665
2. Dr Cash 685
Cr Other income 685
3. Dr cash 18675
Cr Account receivable 18675
4. Dr Account receivable 9600
Cr Sales revenue 9600
5. Dr Cash 8000
Cr Account receivable 8000
6.Dr Utility expense 395
Utility expense payable 395
7. Dr Supplies 1255
Cr Accounts payable 1255
8. Dr Accounts payable 2600
Cr Cash 2600
9.Dr Salaries and wages expense 12200
Cr Cash 12200
Explanation:
Answer:
The employer will be held liable.
Explanation:
If the external agent brings harm or injury to a third party in the course of an employment, the employer is held liable. When a principal directs an agent to commit for a tort or if the principal is aware of the consequences of carrying the instructions of the agent could cause harm or injure the person, then the principal is liable.
It is called direct liability.
The liability for the intentional tort which is imputed to the principal when the agent acts to further the business of the principal.
The agent is personally liable under the following circumstances :
- Foreign principal
- Agent signs the contract in his own name
- Non-existent principal
- Principal cannot be sued:
- Undisclosed principal
Example :
A credit card company hires a sales person and offers a company van to make sales in that area. The sales person uses the office van to official purposes. But one night, he drove the car to a friend's party and while coming he drove over a pedestrian. In this case, the owner of the company will not be held liable as the sales person uses the company van for his personal use while going out for party with his friends. While causing the accident, the sales person was not not using the office van for official purposes and was not tendering official duties at that time.
Answer:
Actively listen if she is at her desk but ask them to approach her at a better time if she is in the lunchroom or in the hallway