Flooding because of dam failures, subsidence, etc. are secondary effects, whereas shaking of structures, liquefaction, etc. by faulting are direct damage.
<h3>What are secondary catastrophic effects?</h3>
Secondary effects are indirectly associated with the occurrence of a catastrophic event (in this case, a earthquake).
Moreover, direct damage makes reference to eventual immediate effects that such catastrophic events may have.
In conclusion, flooding because of dam failures, subsidence, etc. are secondary effects, whereas shaking of structures, liquefaction, etc. by faulting are direct damage.
Learn more about immediate catastrophic effects here:
brainly.com/question/7413514
#SPJ1
Answer:
a) w = 98°
b) x = 137°
Explanation:
The reason is that they are angles at a point
Which means they are equal to 360°.
Example;
a) 165° + 97° + w = 360°
262° + w = 360°
You then group like terms
w = 360° - 262°
w = 98°
Note: The reason is the same for b)
Answer:
They constructed the Aswan Dam to eliminate seasonal flooding.
Explanation:
Answer:
a. I only
Explanation:
This is the state that would be the least impacted by gerrymandering. Gerrymandering refers to a practice of establishing an advantage for a political party by manipulating district boundaries. There are two main ways of doing so, which are "cracking" (minimizing the voting power of a group by splitting it over several districts) and "packing" (concentrating the whole group in one single district to minimize their power in other ones). A state that is diverse in all of its districts is unlikely to be affected by gerrymandering.