I surmise that at the outset, we ought to have had extraordinary sensitivity to the means being taken in the French Revolution since we had a considerable measure of similitudes in our current transformation and theirs. Yet, it was their King that helped us win our upset by sending troops to battle our war against the British. I don't imagine that is was ideal for us to betray him. We ought to have by one means or another had conciliatory relations to the progressive pioneers to stop the carnage. We didn't need to slaughter our lord to set up our nation, I figure we could have mediated to stop the losses of the French Revolution.
Answer:
battle of concord
Explanation:
The phrase indicates that the shots fired at British troops during the Battle of Concord marked America's first victory against the powerful British army, which in turn sparked the Revolutionary War and lead to America's independence.
<span>I've heard differing people say different things, but most state a nation, tribe, band, and/or clan. So what are each of these, and what is the difference between them?</span>
The correct answer among the choices is:
<span>Cavour helped the cause of Italian unification by “working secretly with the French to push
Austria out of northern Italy”.</span>
<span>Cavour’s contribution to Italy’s unification was a historic
one. This is why to a certain degree he can be justly applauded as the leader
who transformed Italy from a geographical expression to a unified country.</span>
<span>Answer: D</span>
The correct answer is C. they tended to be Catholic and Jewish.
A is incorrect because even before, most immigrants were Protestants from England. B is incorrect because most immigrants came from England so they obviously spoke English. D is incorrect because this wasn't a trait of the new immigrants only, but rather of the old ones too. However, what was different about them was their religion, which tended to be Catholicism and Judaism.
