Answer:
B Obama does not think that war is what nations should strive for, but also recognizes it cannot be completely avoided when achieving and protecting peace
Explanation:
Obama was awarded peace noble prize for his views on peace. He was votary of peace but at the same time , he did not rule out the importance of war in achieving peace. He was of the view that war is necessary to achieve peace because war is instrumental in bringing about peace in the world.
Be more pacific plz so i can help
The general answer given below about the passage "Indifference the, is not only a sin, it is a punishment" is likely to help you answer the question. The reason for this general answer is that I was unable to find the answer choices for this question online:
- In his speech "The Perils of Indifference," Elie Wiesel discusses how apathy in front of human suffering can lead to a tragedy.
- By saying that indifference is a punishment, he means that being indifferent (doing nothing) when seeing others suffering is the same as hurting them.
- When we do not help a victim, we are siding with the criminal. When we do not feed the hungry or aide the sick, we are watching them die. Therefore, indifference is as cruel as hurting others.
- Elie Wiesel is a survivor of the Holocaust. Therefore, he knows what it feels like to be beaten, starved, tortured and have no one at all help you.
- Wiesel knows, thus, how awful indifference is. As he suffered in the hands of the Nazi, he wondered why no one did anything to help.
- Why didn't other countries intervene to free the prisoners? Why were people watching millions of people die, killed by a cruel regime, without doing anything to stop it?
- In "The Perils of Indifference," Wiesel condemns inaction, apathy, inertia.
- According to him, <u>doing nothing is as good as harming</u>. If you don't help, you contribute to the suffering.
- The only one who gains something from indifference is the criminal, the aggressor.
Learn more about the topic here:
brainly.com/question/2429867
Answer:
At Rome, moreover, Caesar won a great and brilliant popularity by his eloquence as ... and much good will from the common people for the friendliness of his manners . . . . He had also a large and gradually increasing political influence in consequence of his lavish hospitality and the general splendour of his mode of life.
Explanation:
