Answer:
A.
Explanation:
This phenomenon best illustrates why intelligence tests need to be revised for predictive validity. The tests are taken initially and show high scores, then they are taken again and show even higher scores. This shows that the individuals are getting smarter. If the test continues to be taken without revision then the same results will continue since the individuals will continue to become smarter but the test will continue being the same. Therefore, becoming much easier for the participants every time. This ultimately leads to better and better scores.
It is crucial that healthcare institutions foster a workplace that is culturally competent. It implies that the traditions and beliefs of the patient should be respected. Fadi's rights are being violated because he had the ability to select his own food.
<h3>What are
Fadi rights?</h3>
Under the Fadi rights, it is not allowed to serve any kind of food that that does not contain pork, this is an alternative used when there is no pork in the given menu.
Healthcare workers should appreciate and honour his freedom to choose his meal or dinner.
Thus, It is crucial that healthcare institutions foster a workplace that is culturally competent.
For more details about Fadi rights, click here:
brainly.com/question/13508875
#SPJ1
They add different things to the car so that they can make the cars faster so they can go onto the market they also make the car more expensive so they can make more money. Don't know if that helps but there.
Answer:
They wanted dominance in colonial power and
the resources that they had in North America ,
thus increasing their nation's wealth. Britain
won because of their navy setup across the
Atlantic which didn't allow the French to send
military reinforcements and supplies.
Answer:
It has been suppressed by <em>Grutter v. Bollinger (2003).</em>
Explanation:
According to the <u>University of California v. Bakke case</u> (1978), college applicants’ race was allowed to be a factor in the admission policy, though racial quotas were ruled as impermissible.
Meanwhile, in 2003 <u>Grutter v. Bollinger</u> <u>case</u> ended with a court's decision that<em> admission policy that favors poorly represented ethnic minority groups does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, only if the policy takes other factors, such as academic excellence, into account.</em>
