Answer:
Pearl Harbor brought the U.S. into WWII, which changed the reason of why we would fight in the war, and potentially changed the outcome of World War II. ... Despite their ships being attacked many times by German submarines, that was not enough to make the U.S. enter the war.
The Battle of Stalingrad halted the German advance in World War II and marked the turning point of the war in Eastern Europe. ... Eisenhower, the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe, led the D-Day invasion to begin the liberation of Western Europe.
Explanation:
Hope it helps army ;))) ♡
By 1774, the year leading up to the Revolutionary War, trouble was brewing in America. Parliament (England's Congress) had been passing laws placing taxes on the colonists in America. There had been the Sugar Act in 1764, the Stamp Act the following year, and a variety of other laws that were meant to get money from the colonists for Great Britain. The colonists did not like these laws.
Great Britain was passing these laws because of the French and Indian War, which had ended in 1763. That war, which had been fought in North America, left Great Britain with a huge debt that had to be paid. Parliament said it had fought the long and costly war to protect its American subjects from the powerful French in Canada. Parliament said it was right to tax the American colonists to help pay the bills for the war
Most Americans disagreed. They believed that England had fought the expensive war mostly to strengthen its empire and increase its wealth, not to benefit its American subjects. Also, Parliament was elected by people living in England, and the colonists felt that lawmakers living in England could not understand the colonists' needs. The colonists felt that since they did not take part in voting for members of Parliament in England they were not represented in Parliament. So Parliament did not have the right to take their money by imposing taxes. "No taxation without representation" became the American rallying cry.
The most important reason was economical: slavery was profitable for slave owners in the South, and they were against its abolishing. The southern plantations were very work -intensive, so a lot of work was needed and slave labour was a very cheap source of labour that the owners didn't want to give up upon.
the correct answer is <span>B. The Southern plantation economy depended on slavery. </span>
?won fewer states than Stephen A. Douglas.Answer:
Explanation:
?won fewer states than Stephen A. Douglas.
