Answer:
A Wolf seeing a Lamb drinking at a brook, took it into his head that he would find some plausible excuse for eating him. So he drew near, and, standing higher up the stream, began to accuse him of disturbing the water and preventing him from drinking.
The Lamb replied that he was only touching the water with the tips of his lips; and that, besides, seeing that he was standing down stream, he could not possibly be disturbing the water higher up. So the Wolf, having done no good by that accusation, said: “Well, but last year you insulted my Father.” The Lamb replying that at that time he was not born, the Wolf wound up by saying: “However ready you may be with your answers, I shall none the less make a meal of you.”
Tyrants need no excuse. A Wolf catches a Lamb by a river and argues to justify killing it. Doesn’t matter as the Wolf needs no excuse.
Tyrants need no excuse.
Eliot-Jacobs
Eliot/Jacobs Version
A Wolf was drinking at a spring on a hillside. On looking up he saw a Lamb just beginning to drink lower down. “There’s my supper,” thought he, “if only I can find some excuse to seize it.” He called out to the Lamb, “How dare you muddle my drinking water?”
“No,” said the Lamb; “if the water is muddy up there, I cannot be the cause of it, for it runs down from you to me.”
Chau wants to teach her audience about the features of green, black and white tea. She will most likely be using <u>comparative organizational pattern.</u>
<u></u>
<u></u>
There are types of organizational patterns available to use-
- Chronological- It is in which the main points are conveyed based upon the time they occurred.
- Topical- It is created around the main points and sub-points.
- Comparative- It deliberates the similarities and differences between two or more things.
- Spatial- It is the right way to convey key ideas.
- Problem-Solution- It is used when the speaker wants to persuade the audience as they have to take part in solving several problems.
- Causal- It informs the audience about the causes and effects that have occurred.
<u />
<u />
It is so because to examine the alikeness or differences between any two things, a comparative organizational pattern has to be utilize. As in comparative speeches, speakers may look at things in a diverse/different way.
Therefore, a comparative speech outlines the eastern and the western societies which could resemble this.
To learn more about comparative organizational pattern here
brainly.com/question/13718850
#SPJ4
A is the answer to this question
Answer:
Explanation:
The best way to write the stage directions is option b. Martha (looking bewildered and taking a long pause before speaking) Josh. What can I say about Josh?
Stage directions are the instructions or information about a scene of a play. These stage directions are included in the script to tell how the actors will enter or act, what is to happen to them in the scene, how to behave, etc.
In the given scenario of a play where Martha has to say something about her best friend Josh, the stage direction can be used to talk about her behavior while having to give the speech.
Most stage directions are put within parenthesis as and when they will occur.
Also, stage directions are an added detail for readers to imagine how the particular character behaves to provide a better understanding of the scene.
By putting Martha's behavior and shy demeanor within parenthesis, the stage direction provides the perfect information about her.
Thus, the correct way of writing the stage direction for Martha's shy demeanor is option b.
In Jack London's "To build a fire" the main theme is Man vs. Nature, the main character is crossing the Alaskan frozen landscape, following the path of the Yukon river. He dismisses the advice of the old-timer and he also doesn't pay attention to his companion, the dog who can feel the threat of the harsh weather. The right answer is the second option.
