I believe it is this.
Part A
Imagination is a powerful force of creativity
Part B
Dickinson compares the “roof” of poetry to the limitless sky.
Nora has a flirtatious behavior that suggests that Helmer and she have a flirtatious but stable relationship but sometimes it is serious. Helmer supports the careless attitude of Nora with money and he also worries and criticizes her habit of squandering money to make her understand the value of saving. This behavior shows that there is still a lot of love in their relationship and that it is not a couple with a bad mood.
If you write one sentence describing the original paragraph's hook, and then a second sentence describing any supporting evidence in the paragraph, and then a third sentence describing the topic sentence, you will have written your critique.
For the first one, I would start by mentioning the characters crime, add something about how it was inexcusable, then incorporate a condensed precis on the characters situation (leaving out any bits that could embody the characters freedom). And end with a statement that discloses that your appeal is unarguable because (enter main argument here) and that is why so and so should be imprisoned.
<span>For the second question, I would personally choose the feminist because it would in theory be easier to explain their basic philosophy and how it is affecting the plot. Because I don't know who the character is, I can't really elaborate further. But please contact me if you need any more help, I'll do what I can. </span>
Answer:
Ice dripped out yessir drippy!!
