Answer: b. Jose Navarro
Explanation:
José Antonio Navarro was one of the early proponents of Texas independence from Spain and then from Mexico. He forged a friendship with Stephen Austin (founder of Texas) as they worked to bring about Texas independence.
Being a native Texan, he represented Texas in the legislature of the state that Texas was part of at the time which was Coahuila y Tejas and he also represented them in the Federal Congress in Mexico City.
<span>Grammar. Grammar consists of the rules that are set for us to make the written word possible in a coherent manner. It is Grammar that allows us to be able to write out and convey messages.</span>
One of the major issues facing the icf/iid facility is an issue emanating from financial constraints as the facility deals in special needs equipments, which are quite costly.
The polling strategy that was used in the 2016 Presidential primary in South Carolina was called a <em>push poll. </em>
Explanation:
This type of polling that was used is when candidates intentionally manipulate the public by using questions that are questionable. They do this by push polling citizens in the state by calling the poll an "opinion poll."
This is a negative way to campaign by using negative questions about the opponent. The pollers also will ask leading questions to get the answers they may otherwise would not of gotten.
Push polls are used in Presidential elections the most, but are used in other elections as well. The American Association for Public Opinion Research has rejected this type of polling.
Learn more about polls at brainly.com/question/11428575
#LearnwithBrainly
Sometime in the mid-1970s the term peace process became widely used to describe the American-led efforts to bring about a negotiated peace between Israel and its neighbors. The phrase stuck, and ever since it has been synonymous with the gradual, step-by-step approach to resolving one of the world's most difficult conflicts. In the years since 1967<span> the emphasis in Washington has shifted from the spelling out of the ingredients of "peace" to the "process" of getting there. … Much of US constitutional theory focuses on how issues should be resolved – the process – rather than on substance – what should be done. … The United States has provided both a sense of direction and a mechanism. That, at its best, is what the peace process has been about. At worst, it has been little more than a slogan used to mask the marking of time.</span><span>[2]</span>
