Answer:
Germany, under Kaiser Wilhelm II was a largely Militarist country. The joined their ally, Austria-Hungary, in war against Serbia, after the death of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and Serbia's rejection of the Austro-Hungarian ultimatum. This ultimatum would have basically put Hungary in charge of the Serbian government, an act of imperialism. The alliances between Austria-Hungary, Germany, and the Ottoman Empire, as well as the Russian, French, and British alliance, later followed by the United States, allowed this to become a full scale world war. Nationalism played a big part in starting WW1, as the Serbian Terrorists who killed the archduke wee in favor of Serbian nationalism and against Austro-Hungarian influence.
Explanation:
I hope this helps.
Answer:
Many of the English colonies in North America founded with practising its religion freely without any threat.
Explanation:
Religion played a significant role in the establishment of the English colonies in North America. The reasons for colonization linked to political, economic, and religion. Many colonies founded to support Britain like Jamestown and the Carolinas. Puritans and Pilgrims arrived in the late seventeenth century. Both religious group influenced by William Bradford and John Winthrop to lead their colonies (Plymouth and Massachusetts Bay) to greatness. The establishment of Plymouth was started by Separatists fleeing for Holland in 1608. Many religious like the Quakers and Puritans formed their colonies based on religious beliefs. They arrive in America to escape persecution in England. William Penn's colony (Pennsylvania) was known for the sheltering of Quakers.
Answer:
It is your decision on if it is right, but I will give insight on the very basics of how our government deals with power distribution and why. And a touch of opinion. Happy New Year!
Explanation:
Giving the president the power of executive authority would make our government the same as a dictatorial one. That is one of the main reasons our government has 3 branches, it’s a checks and balances system that keeps those in power relying on each other to make decisions. The question of if it is right that a president should or shouldn’t have executive authority has raged on every since America first considered becoming independent from Britain, but based on the numerous times a British monarch given executive authority abused it, we can guess the same thing could easily happen with our president. At the very least a president should not have full freedom in passing policies, but the real difficult question is “To what extent should a president be able to pass policies, and congress oversee the affairs of the president?” This question applies to not just the president and Congress, but also the judicial branch and state governments. It’s a tough question.
