I believe it's...the new act demanded that colonists provide living quarters to British Soldiers, even in private homes.
The main obligations that a peasant had to the lord of the manor included the constant upkeep and maintenance of the land, as well a promise to give up the land upon command.
1829, having been passed by the supreme court, under the leadership of John Marshall who was a VERY big government man, in 1924.
However, the side he came down on in the Maysville Road veto was that the Maysville Road was totally local and therefore federal funds should not be used for local issues. Then again, he may have opposed the bill simply because Henry Clay supported it and those men hated each other.
So perhaps by his veto of the Maysville Road bill, he was saying he did not agree with Gibbons v Ogden but like I said, to my knowledge, there is no record on how he felt about it (but I am sure he had an opinion because the man had opinions about EVERYTHING
Answer:
4
Explanation:
Four of the nine Justices must vote to accept a case.
