Utilitarian ethics is a theory suggests that if playing the killer in simulated killing leads to more unhappiness than not doing so, then playing the killer is wrong.
About Utilitarian ethics
An ethical theory known as utilitarianism establishes right from wrong by emphasising results. It embodies consequentialism in some way. According to utilitarianism, the decision that will result in the greatest benefit for the largest number of people is the most morally right one. For instance, the utilitarian viewpoint holds that you should select the flavour of ice cream that will make you feel the happiest if you are making a decision for yourself. If you like chocolate but detest vanilla, go with chocolate for the delight it will provide and stay away from vanilla as it will make you unhappy.
Consequentialist, welfareist, impartial, and aggregationist are the four distinguishing traits shared by all ethical systems in the utilitarian family. They consequently place the highest moral priority on advancing everyone's general well-being.
To know more about utilitarianism:
brainly.com/question/29313132
#SPJ4
Answer: Curiosity driven action shown by Dashiel
Explanation:
Curiosity is the feeling which makes a person investigate about any phenomena or happening through experience or learning.It displays interest of person in something.
According to the question, Dashiel's behavior is displaying his curiosity to learn about candle and wax through touching it even though his mother has told him not to do so.He is trying to gain experience and learning because of his interest through attempting to dip finger in wax.
its between natural gas and diamonds
Answer:
D. a game in which players act in rational, selfminusinterested ways that leave everyone worse off
Explanation:
The prisoners dilemma involves the idea that both people would act in self interests, but this self interests would not help the other one or the group to have a better outcome, so people is acting in detriment of the society or the other participant, it often happens that both people chose to protect themselves damaging the other person, and thus since both had choosen that option both are worse off after it.
<span>A Christian worldview has the stamp of reason and reality and can stand the test both of history and experience. Every chapter in this book is predicated on a Christian view of things, a view of the world which cannot be infringed upon, or accepted or rejected piecemeal, but stands or falls in its integrity. Such a wholistic approach offers a stability of thought, a unity of comprehensive insight which bears not only on the religious sphere, but on the whole of thought. A Christian worldview is not built on two types of truth (religious and philosophical or scientific), but on a universal principle and all-embracing system that shapes religion, natural and social sciences, law, history, healthcare, the arts, the humanities, and all disciplines of study with application for all of life. </span>
