Looking at the information, candidate A would likely be in favor of government-funded health care. Candidate B would be probably be opposed to it.
<h3 /><h3>How to identify the motivations of a political candidate?</h3>
The analysis of a political debate is an essential tool to understand the proposal of each politician, especially when their ideas are refuted, thus helping the voter in the best comparison between government proposals and candidate choice.
Therefore, in the debate of the issue it is possible to better understand the position of candidates A and B in relation to responsibilities, leading to a greater probability of identifying a possible action of each in a situation.
Find out more about political debate here:
brainly.com/question/18038622
#SPJ1
The cause of the Scopes Trial was disagreement about evolution.
One side thought that evolution should be taught in schools, while another side
said that it shouldn’t. It was also said that teaching of evolution was in
violation of Tennessee’s Butler Act which stated that it was unlawful to teach evolution
in any state-funded school.
It was purposely meant to also bring publicity, but in the
end, John Scopes was fined $100 dollars which is equivalent to over $1000
dollars today. Many of the people and reporters went to the “big-shot” lawyers involved
in the case so, the lawyers to morph the truth into anything they wished and
the public hung on to their words. One thing it teaches is that we need to look
at both sides because one side could be changed to what someone wants.
Answer: YOU SHALL NOT PASS
Explanation: ITS A SIGNNN
Answer:
The main reason is to prevent a communist take over. They go to war and they finally declare on one side being communist and the other anti-communist
Yeah the dreadnought is right.
