Answer:
Not to Appoint government officials if voting districts are unfair.
Explanation:
As a result of the Supreme Court decision in Baker v. Carr, courts can require states to not appoint government officials if voting districts are unfair.
In the past redistricting issues weren’t settled by federal courts as a result of the people feeling it had political undertone and would be biased but it has changed as a result of the Baker v. Carr Supreme Court judgement.
Because of the needed help in bargaining for higher wages and better working conditions.
<span>the election was finally resolved by the Supreme court
The scandal revolves around the recount on the votes in Florida that would determine the outcome of the election and a recount determined that bush won with a very small margin.T </span><span>he Supreme Court decision allowed this result to stand and cost Al Gore his Candidacy</span>
I believe this is
a capitalist ideology
Such as America
