1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Trava [24]
3 years ago
15

In what way were both the universal declaration of human rights and the postwar push the civil rights reactions to the war

History
1 answer:
lesantik [10]3 years ago
8 0
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, established after World War II, outlined rights that all individuals should have regardless of where they live. This was a direct result of the war, as the genocide conducted by Nazi Germany severely limited the rights of individuals all over Europe. The systematic killing of individuals showed that a list of rights that all individuals should have was needed.

The Civil Rights was also a reaction to World War II. African-Americans served bravely during this war, helping to liberate millions of Europeans. However, when returning home, they were continually mistreated due to the discriminatory policies in the Deep South. African-Americans who served in the war felt that they should have victory over discrimination in the US. This campaign became known as the Double V Campaign.
You might be interested in
During the Age of Jackson one significant change to the voting system was - A. All Americans were granted the right to vote A. A
Goryan [66]

Answer:

D is the answer.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

:)

7 0
3 years ago
Develop an argument that evaluates the extent to which cultural, political, military, or economic changes resulting from the Col
Tpy6a [65]

Answer:

East Asia:

The end of World War 2 resulted in the utter collapse of the Axis powers, namely Germany, Italy, and Japan, and pulled the United States out of isolationism, which resulted in the emergence of two global superpowers: The United States and the Soviet Union. However, after the Yalta Conference, it quickly became clear that Stalin wished to dominate Eastern Europe and develop a buffer zone between the remnants of Germany and the USSR in order to 'protect against any possible future German aggression - at least officially. However, it was widely believed that Stalin wished to spread the revolution around the globe. This was despite promises of free elections in occupied territories.

The issue here is that Communism and Capitalism are drastically different and intensely clashing ideologies. One values freedom of market, while the other values state control of the markets. The emergence of nuclear weapons also made the Soviets come to a harsh realization - that the American arsenal was superior to theirs. As such, the Russians began developing nuclear weapons of their own, and they would soon see this success come to fruition. This created massive tensions between Russia and the United States, as the power of nuclear technology had already been displayed in full view on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Third, the American fear of communism and the sometimes excessive witch-hunting lead to extreme mistrust between the two powers. As such, they often supported opposing sides in proxy conflicts.

For this example, I will be using the outbreak of the Vietnam war. When the war began in 1955, America and Russia both began supplying their respective sides -  Russia, the Viet Minh and America the Republican government in Saigon. As the conflict escalated and it became increasingly spotlighted South Vietnam's inefficencies, lack of military competency, and underground pro-communist insurrections, America began deploying soldiers. This began slowly at first and escalated into over 543,000 active troops at its peak.

Despite such a large troop presence, the communist and their insurgent allies were continuing to gain victories. America became desperate to save face and secure some kind of victory, even if it was a strategic one. As such, they began napalming the Vietnamese jungles and bombing Hanoi and other major Northern cities in an attempt to weaken and possibly destroy the Soviet-backed government. As such, it is arguable that the American fervor for victory and triumph over the Communist cause was high enough that they were willing to attempt to destroy an entire nation. The damages done by the American military were massive, and the civilian casualties extreme. Because of this, we can say that this region of East Asia was riddled with conflict and devastation because of America and the Soviet Union's ideological rivalry.

7 0
2 years ago
Why did slavery become more widespread and brutal in 1800’s
ale4655 [162]

Because this was a period in which there was a great export of slaves, in addition to the fact that there were great discussions of white men and blacks still fighting for their total freedom.

In general, starting from the history of a large part of these peoples, we can say that there was domestic slavery in Africa, and not a commercial slavery, that is, among several African peoples, the slave was not a commodity, but an arm to more in harvesting, livestock, mining and hunting; an extra warrior in military campaigns.

These African peoples preferred women as slaves, since they were responsible for agriculture and could generate new members for the community. And many of the children born to slave mothers were considered free by the community. The vast majority of African peoples were matrilineal, that is, they organized themselves based on maternal ancestry, starting with the transmission of names and privileges from the mother. In this way, a slave mother could become a political leader in her society, having generated the heir to the local leadership.

In addition, a slave who was faithful to his master could occupy a position of local prestige, including owning his slaves. Thus, not always being a slave was a condition of humiliation and disrespect. Even representing a submission, it was a situation that was often the same as that of other free people.

3 0
3 years ago
Why do you think white American viewed Native American Indians as such a threat?
egoroff_w [7]
They didn't understand there culture because it was different and because of this they viewed them as savages
6 0
3 years ago
)Which statement is true of both plebeians and slaves? They turned out in large numbers to vote in assemblies. They worked at a
Delvig [45]

The answer is B. I am 100% sure and know this from experience.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A hole in the ozone layer can allow damaging ______________<br> to reach the earth.
    12·1 answer
  • President george w bush sent troops to afghanistan and iraq with the approval of who?
    10·2 answers
  • What was the center of egyptian life
    7·1 answer
  • What was nixons role in the Watergate scandal
    7·1 answer
  • Please HELP What was one action that was taken by the First Continental Congress?
    6·2 answers
  • How is personal choice related to the universality of sin?
    10·1 answer
  • President Taft's policies toward Latin America become known as "dollar diplomacy".
    14·2 answers
  • By authority of the good people of these Colonies, (we) solemnly publish and declare, that these United Colonies are, and of Rig
    6·1 answer
  • (5.) Author Horatio Alger popularized short stories and novels that explored the pursuit of the
    5·1 answer
  • We ran into a problem. Reconnecting... Refresh now
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!