Answer:
A multiple choice offshore suppliers are changing the way work
<h2>
The least expensive route is to use "Direct distribution Channel"</h2>
Explanation:
There are two modes where a manufacturer or farmer can reach the product to the customer.
1. Direct channel: This enables the customer to directly buy from the manufacturers.
Example: Online purchase. In this the customer has direct access to the product and orders online. The manufacture has to find a source to deliver the goods to the customer.
Manufacturer should have warehouses, shipping centers, etc to deliver the product.
2. Indirect channel: Relies mainly on intermediaries to perform product distribution to the customers. This includes dealer, sub-dealer and many other to reach the product to the customer.
Answer:
Hurdle rate of return.
Explanation:
A hurdle rate can be regarded as minimum rate of return that is been required by an investor or manager
on a particular project or investment.
The hurdle rate gives the description of the appropriate compensation as regards level of risk present. There are
higher hurdle rates associated with riskier projects.
It should be noted that A minimum acceptable rate of return for an investment decision is called the Hurdle rate of return.
Answer:
the gourmet food that he was fed was poorly prepared
Explanation:
Shopkeeper's priviledge is the law that allows United States shop owners detain people that shoplifted from their shop.
They must have proof that the person did the crime and also are only able to hold him for a reasonable time.
In the given scenario the shop owner catches Ed red-handed in the act of shoplifting. He and an employee gently restrain Ed in the back room, feeding him gourmet food and wine until the local sheriff finally shows up three days later.
Ed can win a tort of false imprisonment if the gourmet food that he was fed was poorly prepared.
There must be proper care given while the suspect is being detained. Being fed poorly prepared food means he was detained under conditions that could be detrimental to his health
Answer:
No, there is no contract between the two parties because of withdrawal of offer (Revocation) before the acceptance of the other party.
Explanation:
When one party offers another party and after some time the offer maker withdraws the offer by communicating that they had revoked then the offer is no more available to the other party and is often termed as Revocation. So when the offer maker revokes before the acceptance of the offer by the other party then their is no offer at consideration to the other party, which means if there is no offer then their can not be an acceptance of an offer and of course when there is no acceptance then there is no contract.
The communication of revocation was held before the acceptance of the offer of the other party which agains says that the contract was not actually formed.