Definitely B,, unless I got it wrong.
Question: Quod signum zodiaci tuum?
What does it say?
Answer: What is your zodiac sign
Hope this helps have a great day
<span>d) false stress is present for everyone in every time period--cavemen faced false examples of stress, and so does modern man.
stress is not a new phenomenon, it goes back to the caveman as when we have to face a situation potentially dangerous we get stressed. what is changed through the ages is the type of stress, as the situation that causes us stress are very different from the one that caused stress in the caveman. for false stress, the same predicament is valid as well.</span>
<h2>
Answer: The third one (Good summaries provide all the data an author uses for support.)</h2>
EXPLANATIONS:
"Good summaries include the writer's opinion on the article." This one isn't correct, because writer's opinions don't matter in summaries. That's like putting your own opinion in your own summary. It's not an important part.
"Good summaries focus on the support details from the body" Support details are for when you're writing the main idea. For summaries, you're just summarizing up what the text says, in some of your own words.
"Good summaries provide all the data an author uses for support." Yes, Summaries provide data an author used for support. Like I said earlier, summaries are the summarized version of what the text says. So basically, you don't want to add boring, un-needed data/details. Use the important data/details the author used.
"Good summaries objectively restate the thesis and crucial details." This is definitely incorrect. Theses (plural form of thesis) are statements that include your opinion. You'd most likely need to use a thesis in an argumentative essay. Also, crucial details are facts to support your thesis. You wouldn't be needing these in your summary.
